Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Allotment of ESOP / ESPS 1 Oct
Source: Bse
Financial Services stocks · Mid cap · NSE
L&T Finance Limited (LTF) is an Upper Layer NBFC, part of the L&T Group, offering diverse financial products and services. It boasts a granular retail franchise with 2,800+ branches, 2.9 Cr+ customers, and a book of over ₹1,29,000 Cr, aiming to be a Risk-first, Tech-first AI-native institution.
SMA20 -13.0% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue +26.5% · PAT +32.4% YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Rev +26% YoY · PAT +32% YoY · operating leverage
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹5,484.2 Cr | +26.5% | +4.6% |
| EBITDA | ₹3,361.1 Cr | NDF | +2.8% |
| Operating margin | 61.3% | NDF | -106 bps |
| PAT | ₹972.8 Cr | +32.4% | +6.2% |
| PAT margin | 17.7% | +79 bps | +27 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 20/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 31.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 35 · legacy U-Score band WATCHLIST · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Q1FY27 saw robust retail book growth (+27% YoY, +6% QoQ) and PAT (+29% YoY, +12% QoQ). RoA improved to 2.48% (+11bps YoY, +8bps QoQ) and RoE to 12.71% (+185bps YoY, +100bps QoQ), driven by strong disbursements and stable NIMs+Fees.
Management reports strong Q1FY27 performance, with book growth and profitability metrics (RoA, RoE) showing positive trends and aligning with Lakshya 2031 goals. Credit cost remains above target, but shows sequential improvement. Digital and AI initiatives are key to future delivery.
Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.
Proprietary AI stack (Cyclops, Nostradamus, Co-pilots) is the operating system for customer lifecycle management, aiming for sustained growth and improved credit.
Retail book increased by 28% YoY to ₹1,27,535 Cr, now comprising 98% of the total book.
Extensive network with 2,800+ branches, 2.9 Cr+ customer database, and active presence in ~2,00,000 villages and 450+ cities/towns.
Phase 4 (Private Cloud Testing by Developers) is in progress (Jul-Aug '26), with workload migration from Public to Private Cloud planned for Aug-Dec '26.
Active Gold Finance branches increased to 343 in Q1FY27 from 130 in Q1FY26, driving 182% YoY book growth.
New villages activated for Rural Group Loans & MFI increased to 23,467 in Q1FY27 from 24,430 in Q1FY26 (QoQ decline from 28,335 in Q4FY26).
100% digital disbursements, 99% eNach penetration (Urban), 97% digital collections (Urban), and 44% digital collections (Rural).
Industry-leading delinquency levels reported across Rural Business Finance, Farm Equipment, Two-Wheeler, Home Loans, and LAP segments.
Proactive Asset Liability Management and diversified liability mix anchored Q1FY27 WACB at 7.20%, supported by 'AAA' domestic ratings.
Credit cost of 2.54% in Q1FY27 remains above the Lakshya 2031 goal of <2%, despite sequential improvement.
Ambitious AI-native strategy requires successful implementation and integration of complex proprietary tech stack (Cyclops, Nostradamus, Co-pilots, Canyon).
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
YoY comparison is crucial for assessing long-term growth and seasonal impacts in financial services, while QoQ comparison highlights sequential momentum in disbursements, asset quality, and profitability.
Book increased by 27% YoY and 6% QoQ to ₹1,29,634 Cr in Q1FY27.
Disbursements grew 36% YoY to ₹23,852 Cr in Q1FY27, though declined 1% QoQ.
NIMs + Fees remained flat QoQ at 10.47% in Q1FY27, up 25bps YoY.
WACB was 7.20% in Q1FY27, down from 7.25% in Q4FY26 and 7.68% in Q1FY26.
Management aims for 20%+ book growth, <2% credit cost, 3.0-3.2% RoA, and 16-18% RoE by 2031.
AI & Tech at LTF is not a means, it is a core operating philosophy to deliver sustained growth, improved credit, and reduced opex.
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| Book Growth | 27% YoY | Sustained growth above 20% as per Lakshya 2031 goals. |
| Credit Cost | 2.54% | Further reduction towards the Lakshya 2031 target of <2%. |
| Return on Assets (RoA) | 2.48% | Continued improvement towards the Lakshya 2031 target of 3.0-3.2%. |
| Rural Digital Collections | 44% | Increase in digital collection penetration in rural segments to enhance efficiency. |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 35th percentile of the scored universe and 51st percentile within Financial Services. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 22/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Financial Services: 51st pctile, median 62 · Mid: 17th pctile, median 76
146 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse