IP
IndiaPulse

Kaveri Seed Company Limited (KSCL)

Micro Cap

FMCG stocks · Micro cap · NSE

Kaveri Seed Company Limited is an Indian seed producer offering a diverse portfolio including cotton, hybrid rice, selection rice, maize, and vegetable seeds. The company reported its Q4 & FY 2025-26 results, highlighting strong growth in non-cotton segments and exports, while facing challenges in its cotton business.

₹744.1
-0.70 · -0.09%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · FMCG P/E 36.0 (n=42)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Mixed fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
FAIR VALUE
52

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
72

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Bearish
27

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
mixed
57

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -14% YoY · PAT -14% YoY · margin expansion · +593% QoQ

Filed 13 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹742 Cr-13.6%+593.5%
EBITDA₹294 Cr-13.0%+1937.5%
Operating margin40.0%+100 bps+5500 bps
PAT₹280 Cr-14.4%NDF
PAT margin37.7%-33 bps+6391 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-02T20:27:20.202Z
Management commentary snapshot

FY26 revenue grew 16.25% YoY, driven by robust non-cotton performance (+23.17%), particularly Maize (+40.17%) and Hybrid Rice (+18.37%). Cotton sales declined 6.6% due to illegal seed availability and higher production costs, impacting profitability. Q4 FY26 total revenue increased 6.8% YoY.

The company's diversification into non-cotton segments and strong export growth are effectively offsetting the significant headwinds in the cotton business. While cotton profitability is under pressure, the positive outlook for Q1 FY27 across multiple segments suggests resilience and potential for overall growth.

Current business mix

Revenue by Segment (FY26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.

Businessmix
Non-Cotton81.3%
Cotton18.7%
Growth engines

Maize Segment Performance

Positive

Maize volumes increased by 18.84%, with revenues recording a strong growth of 40.17% in FY26. Q4 maize revenue increased by 15.8%.

Export Business Expansion

Positive

Export revenues are expected to register approximately 90% growth during FY2025–26 and recorded ~76% growth in Q4.

New Cotton Product Contribution

Positive

Contribution from new cotton products increased significantly, rising from 10.3% to 30.05%.

Hybrid Rice Revenue Growth

Positive

Hybrid rice revenues increased by 18.3% in FY26, despite marginal volume growth.

Tailwinds

Increased Maize Acreages

Positive

Maize acreages increased by 10.79% in FY26 compared to last financial year, with increases in UP, Punjab, Bihar, Assam.

Increased Rice Sowing Area

Positive

Rice sowing area across the States increased by 0.89% in FY26, with growing trends in West Bengal, Assam, and Telangana.

Increased Sunflower Sowing Area

Positive

Sunflower sowing area across the States increased by 9.76% in FY26, particularly in Karnataka and Haryana.

Headwinds

Illegal Cotton Seed Availability

Negative

Cotton sales were impacted due to the increase in illegal cotton seed availability.

Higher Cotton Seed Production Costs

Negative

Higher cotton seed production costs adversely affected profitability margins.

Restrictions on Hybrid Rice Cultivation

Negative

Restrictions on hybrid rice cultivation in Punjab impacted sales performance in the state.

Reduced Cotton Acreages

Negative

Cotton acreages are down by 2.60% in FY26, with a downfall trend in key markets like Gujarat and Maharashtra.

Risk radar

Illegal Seed Market Competition

Negative

The increase in illegal cotton seed availability directly impacted cotton sales.

Regulatory/Government Actions

Negative

Restrictions on hybrid rice cultivation in Punjab impacted sales, indicating vulnerability to government actions.

Input Cost Volatility

Negative

Higher cotton seed production costs adversely affected profitability margins.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

Both full-year (YoY) and quarterly (YoY) comparisons are crucial. Full-year provides a comprehensive view of annual performance and strategic shifts, while Q4 YoY highlights recent momentum and the impact of seasonal factors in the agricultural sector.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Cotton Sales Volume Trend

Negative

Cotton sales were impacted due to the increase in illegal cotton seed availability.

Hybrid Rice Volume vs. Revenue Growth (FY26)

Positive

Hybrid rice volumes registered a marginal growth of 0.3%, while revenues increased by 18.3%.

Maize Volume vs. Revenue Growth (FY26)

Positive

Maize volumes increased by 18.84%, with revenues recording a strong growth of 40.17%.

Vegetable Seed Sales Volume Growth (FY26)

Positive

Vegetable seed sales volumes increased by 8.4%.

Management forward view

Q1 FY27 Cotton Sales Outlook

Positive

Management is expecting growth in cotton sales across North, Central, and South India driven by new hybrid products in Q1 FY27.

Q1 FY27 Hybrid Rice Growth

Positive

Hybrid rice growth is expected from key markets including Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, and Jharkhand in Q1 FY27.

Q1 FY27 Export Business Outlook

Positive

Export business performance is expected to remain strong in Q1 FY27.

Q1 FY27 Vegetable Seed Business Outlook

Positive

The vegetable seed business outlook remains positive for Q1 FY27.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Cotton Sales RecoverySales impacted by illegal seeds and declining acreages.Evidence of growth in cotton sales, particularly from new hybrid products, and stabilization of acreages in key markets.
Non-Cotton Segment MomentumStrong revenue growth in Maize, Hybrid Rice, and Vegetables.Sustained high growth rates in non-cotton segments and continued diversification of revenue streams.
Profitability Margin ImprovementAdversely affected by higher cotton seed production costs.Signs of margin recovery, potentially from better cost management or improved pricing power in non-cotton segments.
Export Revenue GrowthExpected ~90% growth in FY26 and ~76% in Q4 FY26.Continued strong performance and expansion in export markets as a significant growth driver.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

27Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -5.9% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 18
Sector RS: 40
Sector 3M: -3.3% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

KSCLdaily · 1Y · AUTO+1.8%
Latest close ₹744.10 on 2026-09-04
Bar
-0.6%
RSI
34
MACD hist
-0.68
52W pos
8%
2026-09-04O ₹748.50H ₹751.80L ₹741.00C ₹744.10Vol 46,257 sh
₹689.11₹777.08₹865.05₹953.02₹1.04k52L744.102026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 34.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~6.3% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 34 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 39% off 52W high · 6% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 52 · FAIR VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

52U-SCORE
FAIR_VALUE

Fundamental score breakdown

FAIR VALUE
Valuation12/30
Growth7/25
Quality11/20
Balance Sheet11/15
Cash Flow7/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
52

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

52/100 · FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • Balance sheet contributes 11/15 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 7/10 to the score.
  • Quality contributes 11/20 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -90.3%.
  • Growth is weaker at 7/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 12/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
15.3
PB
2.2
EV/EBITDA
10.8
ROE
18.2%
ROCE
18.8%
FCF Yield
2.3%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
-90.3%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
52
Previous: 52
Verdict
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
-90.3%
Previous: -90.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
49
50
52
52
52
52
52
52
52
52
52
52

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹611.03
-21.8% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
8.1
Growth-justified Value
₹391.07
-90.3% MoS
PEG
9.56

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
72Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 69th percentile of the scored universe and 20th percentile within FMCG. Main check: results consistency is weak at 57/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 60.5%. Key concern: Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-6 Cr.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
166 docs text-extracted · 82 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
69th percentile

overall median 67 · FMCG: 20th pctile, median 78 · Micro: 50th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

166 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
62
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
88
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
68
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
57
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 60.5%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 2.3%.
  • 12 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-6 Cr.
  • OPM spread across recent quarters is 58%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
15.30
P/B
2.18
EV/EBITDA
10.84
Market Cap
3828.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
18.20%
ROCE
18.80%
ROA
9.03%
Dividend Y
0.67%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
6.00%
EPS 5Y
1.00%
Revenue 3Y
9.00%
EPS 3Y
11.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
4.22
Book Value
342.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
2.25%
FCF Positive Y
12/5
OCF
-6.00 Cr
EPS TTM
48.52

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
60.50%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
7%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in FMCG, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.