Skip to content

JITF Infralogistics Limited (JITFINFRA)

Small Cap

Infra stocks · Small cap · NSE

JITF Infralogistics Limited operates in Logistics, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹260.6
-1.90 · -0.72%
Market cap ₹685 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result12 Aug, 04:45 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Infra P/E 15.4 (n=87)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

29Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -10.1% / mo · MACD + · sector -2.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 25
Sector RS: 35
Sector 3M: -8.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but the sector index is below its 100-session average. View sector evidence

Technical chart

JITFINFRAD candles · FIT view-14.6%
Latest close ₹260.60 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-1.7%
RSI
34
MACD hist
0.17
52W pos
18%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹265.00H ₹265.00L ₹257.50C ₹260.60Vol 12,396 sh
₹249.87₹291.85₹333.82₹375.80₹417.78₹260.602026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

JITFINFRANifty InfraNifty 500
-36%-22%-8%+5%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026JITFINFRA -32.5%Nifty Infra -8.2%Nifty 500 -5.6%
JITFINFRA
-32.5%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Infra
-8.2%
Vs Nifty 500
-26.9 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-39.8%
₹433.2
52W range position
18%
₹222.4 - ₹433.2
ATR (14)
4.8%
₹12.5
Volume vs 20D
0.72x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.5 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹257.5 - ₹289.7
28.0% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
24

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
22

Revenue +20.7% · PAT NDF YoY

Technical
Bearish
29

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-26322.0%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
59

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 22/100

margin compression · Rev +21% YoY

Filed 12 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹664 Cr+20.7%-26.1%
EBITDA₹141.8 Cr+9.1%-11.0%
Operating margin21.4%-227 bps+362 bps
PAT₹-2.1 CrNDFNDF
PAT margin-0.3%+55 bps+56 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
3262.00
P/B
2.13
EV/EBITDA
1959.06
Market Cap
685.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
0.07%
ROCE
0.11%
ROA
0.07%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
6.00%
EPS 5Y
6.00%
Revenue 3Y
7.00%
EPS 3Y
7.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
4.86×
Altman Z
7.74
Book Value
125.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.03%
FCF Positive Y
8/5
OCF
0.32 Cr
EPS TTM
0.07

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
63.03%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
21%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 2,808+24.0% vs prev
02808Mar 2017: 543Mar 2018: 400Mar 2019: 581Mar 2020: 844Mar 2021: 928Mar 2022: 1,234Mar 2023: 1,589Mar 2024: 2,535Mar 2025: 2,265Mar 2026: 2,808FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: -10.0-106.9% vs prev
-157.00145.0Mar 2017: -113Mar 2018: -157Mar 2019: -114Mar 2020: -136Mar 2021: -135Mar 2022: -129Mar 2023: -107Mar 2024: 91.0Mar 2025: 145Mar 2026: -10.0FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
No data

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 34.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • Recent death cross (SMA50 crossed below SMA200).
  • SMA20 falling (~11.2% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 34 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 40% off 52W high · 17% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

28
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-8.5%
3M return
-32.5%
6M return
-17.9%
1Y return
-19.3%
RS 1D
+2
RS 20D
-5
Sector rank
#16
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is 15.6% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -3.3%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 79.16+0.30%
647892106120Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2679
RS vs Nifty 50079

Valuation & peers

U-Score 24 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

24U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth5/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet10/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
24

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

24/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Balance sheet contributes 10/15 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -26322.0%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
3262.0
PB
2.1
EV/EBITDA
1959.1
ROE
0.1%
ROCE
0.1%
FCF Yield
0.0%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
-26322.0%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
24
Previous: 24
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-26322.0%
Previous: -26322.0%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹14.03
-1757.3% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
14.1
Growth-justified Value
₹0.99
-26322.0% MoS
PEG
509.69

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Infra — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
SAVY
SME
Savy Infra and Logistics Ltd.
Logistics
match 82
78
6.7
39.8%
+73%
DEEP VALUE
DESTINY
SME
Destiny Logistics & Infra Ltd.
Logistics
match 81
18
684.0
0.5%
-615%
OVERVALUED
AVG
Small
AVG Logistics Limited
Logistics
match 76
51
25.6
10.2%
+59%
FAIR VALUE
WCIL
Small
Western Carriers (India) Limited
Logistics
match 76
18
24.7
4.6%
-351%
OVERVALUED
ACCURACY
Small
Accuracy Shipping Limited
Logistics
match 75
24
16.1
3.2%
-423%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

JITF Infralogistics Limited operates in Logistics, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
59Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 25th percentile of the scored universe and 35th percentile within Infra. Main check: results consistency is weak at 39/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
25th percentile

overall median 67 · Infra: 35th pctile, median 64 · Small: 28th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
43
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
48
watch · leverage and solvency
Discipline
76
strong · capital discipline
Results
39
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 63%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.00.
  • ▸4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸Altman Z is 0.91.
  • ▸3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸Only 1 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸Interest coverage is 1.4x.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

5 shown
AnnouncementSep 2026

Sep 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Retirement 2 Sep - Dr. Raj Kamal Aggarwal, Girish Sharma and Dhananjaya Pati Tripathi cease as Independent Directors on 4 Sept 2026.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementSep 2026

Sep 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Change in Management 10 Sep - Board appoints Shraddha RJ Prithvi as Chairperson & MD from 10 Sep 2026; Pranay Kumar resigns.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.