IP
IndiaPulse

HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (HDFCLIFE)

Large Cap

Financial Services stocks · Large cap · NSE

HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited is an Indian life insurance provider offering a range of individual and group insurance solutions. It focuses on long-term savings and protection, leveraging a diversified distribution network including HDFC Bank, agency, and non-bank alliances.

₹546.4
+12.90 · +2.42%
Quote04 Sept, 03:58 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags03 May 2026
Coverage12/14 · 86%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Financial Services P/E 18.5 (n=240)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
19

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
68

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
40

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
stable
75

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Average · 42/100

margin compression · Rev +15% YoY · PAT +12% YoY · +70% QoQ

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹33,759 Cr+14.6%+69.7%
EBITDA₹506 Cr+15.3%+368.5%
Operating margin1.5%+0 bps+90 bps
PAT₹611 Cr+11.5%+22.9%
PAT margin1.8%-5 bps-69 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-07-23T03:41:04.510Z
Management commentary snapshot

Q1 FY27 saw overall APE growth of 9% (individual APE 7%), VNB up 9%, and PAT up 12% YoY. New business margins improved sequentially to 25%, while 13-month persistency moderated. AUM crossed INR 4 trillion, and solvency improved to 185%.

HDFC Life delivered Q1 FY27 results broadly in line with management's FY27 aspirations, with strong growth in protection and annuities. While the HDFC Bank channel remains subdued, other channels show robust performance. Margin expansion is noted, but management prioritizes growth.

Current business mix

Individual APE by Product

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 5 reported categories.

Businessmix
Unit-linked products44.0%
Non-par savings22.0%
Participating products15.0%
Retail protection8.0%
Annuities11.0%
Growth engines

Retail Protection

Retail Protection continued to outperform the company average growing by 42% and retail sum assured should also continue to outpace the industry.

Agency Channel

Our agency channel grew ahead of the company average at 21%, with particularly healthy traction in protection and annuity.

Non-bank Alliances

Our non-bank alliances also delivered a strong quarter with retail protection growing by 60% year-on-year.

Variable Annuity Proposition

Annuity saw strong momentum on the back of our variable annuity proposition launched in Q4 FY26 and which now accounts for just under half of our annuity mix.

Capacity and execution

Agency Branch Expansion

Branches opened in our agency channel in the past 24 months contribute almost 16% to our agency APE. The new branches were in Tier 2, Tier 3 markets.

Overall Branch Network

We have reached 700-plus branches across maybe 600-plus cities, which is a significant reach. We have slowed down the expansion.

Tailwinds

Improving Macro Backdrop

The improving macro backdrop is constructive for long-term savings and protection businesses like ours.

Favorable Yield Environment

Non-par savings crossed mid-20s on a run rate basis, aided by calibrated rate actioning across select cohorts supported by a favorable yield environment.

Benign Competitive Environment

Most of the competition is now completely benign on those products, which were obviously not profitable for them as well.

Credit Environment

Credit Protect also delivered healthy growth of 19%, supported by a recovery in the MFI segment, as the credit environment has been good and disbursements are up.

Headwinds

HDFC Bank Channel Subdued

Business through the HDFC Bank channel remains subdued this quarter, reflecting softer volumes at the overall bank level.

Geopolitical Escalations

Geopolitical escalations and risks can resurface quickly and we are watching this closely, given bearing on oil prices and broader market sentiment.

El Nino Impact

El Nino also remains a factor we are tracking, though we do not see this as a broad-based risk at this stage.

Residual GST Impact

Residual GST impact now stands at 60 basis points, and we remain on track to fully neutralize it over the coming quarters.

Risk radar

Regulatory Changes

The RBI regulations on third-party product distribution finalized last month and effective January 1st, provide a framework around best-selling practices for distributors.

Market Volatility

Unit-linked demand remained resilient despite market volatility.

Persistency Moderation

Our 13-month persistency moderated by around 200 basis points to 84% broadly in line with our expectations and driven largely by specific cohorts and softer collections in unit-linked products.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is crucial for assessing overall business growth and profitability trends, especially in a sector that can have seasonal variations. QoQ comparison is important for tracking sequential momentum in new business margins, persistency, and channel-specific performance, particularly for the HDFC Bank channel's recovery.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Overall APE Growth

Overall APE growth was stronger at 9%, supported by robust growth in credit life and group business.

Individual APE Growth

Q1 individual APE grew by 7%.

Value of New Business (VNB) Growth

Our value of new business grew 9% to INR 879 crores during the quarter.

New Business Margins (NBM)

New business margins stood at 25%, aided by better product profile, which helped absorb scale-related pressure and a GST impact of approximately 60 basis points.

Management forward view

FY27 Growth Aspiration

For FY27, our aspiration remains unchanged, to grow in line with or faster than the industry and to deliver VNB growth broadly in line with APE growth.

Margin Strategy

Going forward, while margins should improve with scale and product mix, we will continue to prioritize growth over margin expansion. And hence, we expect new business margins to remain range bound at current levels.

HDFC Bank Channel Outlook

While it is early days, we see growth pick up as a matter of time rather than anything structural, and we expect the channel to progressively contribute to growth as the year progresses.

Product Portfolio Balance

We expect our product portfolio to remain balanced. We do not anticipate ULIP mix increasing meaningfully from current levels and expect the share of non-par savings products to improve gradually.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
HDFC Bank Channel GrowthMarginally lower or flattish in Q1 FY27.Progressive contribution to growth as the year progresses, with market share trending closer to last year's run rate.
New Business Margins (NBM)25% in Q1 FY27.Margins to remain range bound at current levels, with any inherent improvement reinvested back into the business for growth.
13-month Persistency84% in Q1 FY27.Improvement through the year, with management expecting it to be in the 84%-85% range.
GST Impact Neutralization60 basis points residual impact.Full neutralization of the remaining GST impact over the coming quarters.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

40Neutral

SMA20 -2.2% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low

Stock trend: 40
Sector RS:

Technical chart

HDFCLIFEdaily · 1Y · AUTO-20.2%
Latest close ₹546.40 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+2.4%
RSI
50
MACD hist
0.25
52W pos
6%
2026-09-04O ₹533.70H ₹548.00L ₹533.30C ₹546.40Vol 60.2L sh
₹520.63₹574.92₹629.22₹683.52₹737.8152L546.402026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 50.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • SMA20 falling (~2.3% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 50 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

12
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
+1.2%
3M return
-2.5%
6M return
-15.4%
1Y return
-29.4%
RS 1D
+3
RS 20D
+5
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
#20
Stage evidence
  • Price is 8.9% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -4.0%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
neutral
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 69.21+2.41%
65758594104Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2669
RS vs Nifty 50069

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 19 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

19U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth4/25
Quality4/20
Balance Sheet3/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
19

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

19/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.
  • Quality contributes 4/20 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 3/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 0.5, in distress territory.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -264.5%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Insurance valuation: embedded value and VNB quality

Insurance economics depend on long-duration book value and new-business profitability.

Insurance P/EV
Primary lens
P/embedded value where available, plus VNB growth and margin.
Secondary checks
Persistency, product mix, solvency, distribution strength.
Main risk check
Accounting profit is less useful than embedded value quality.
PE
60.1
PB
6.1
EV/EBITDA
101.5
ROE
11.3%
ROCE
10.3%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.2
MoS
-264.5%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
19
Previous: 19
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-264.5%
Previous: -264.5%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
17
17
19
18
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹136.05
-301.6% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
16.4
Growth-justified Value
₹149.9
-264.5% MoS
PEG
6.68

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
68Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 56th percentile of the scored universe and 70th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 55/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: Altman Z is 0.54.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
74 docs text-extracted · 37 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
56th percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 70th pctile, median 62 · Large: 32nd pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

74 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
55
watch · leverage and solvency
Discipline
68
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
75
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 7 years of positive FCF.
  • 3/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
  • OPM spread across recent quarters is 3.7%.

Trust risks

  • Altman Z is 0.54.
  • Profit margin is 1.2%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
60.10
P/B
6.07
EV/EBITDA
101.51
Market Cap
118710.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
11.30%
ROCE
10.30%
ROA
0.46%
Dividend Y
0.38%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
7.00%
EPS 5Y
7.00%
Revenue 3Y
12.00%
EPS 3Y
12.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.17
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
0.54
Book Value
90.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
7/5
OCF
22625.00 Cr
EPS TTM
9.14

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
50.54%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
6%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 96.9k-4.5% vs prev
0101kMar 2016: 18.1kMar 2017: 30.6kMar 2018: 32.3kMar 2019: 38.9kMar 2020: 29.4kMar 2021: 71.5kMar 2022: 67.1kMar 2023: 70.2kMar 2024: 101.5kMar 2025: 96.9kFY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 1,811+15.1% vs prev
01811Mar 2016: 817Mar 2017: 887Mar 2018: 1,107Mar 2019: 1,278Mar 2020: 1,297Mar 2021: 1,361Mar 2022: 1,327Mar 2023: 1,368Mar 2024: 1,574Mar 2025: 1,811FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 12.9+2.8% vs prev
027.1Mar 2016: 25.1%Mar 2017: 22.3%Mar 2018: 22.8%Mar 2019: 22.1%Mar 2020: 27.1%Mar 2021: 20.6%Mar 2022: 9.8%Mar 2023: 12.6%Mar 2024: 12.6%Mar 2025: 12.9%FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Peers

Business-comparable names in Financial Services, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.