Skip to content

Gujarat Raffia Industries Limited (GUJRAFFIA)

Small Cap

Consumer stocks · Small cap · NSE

Gujarat Raffia Industries Limited operates in Packaging, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹53.18
-2.79 · -4.98%
Market cap ₹21.8 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals04 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result13 Aug, 04:35 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 22.2 (n=441)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

61Bullish

full bull SMA stack · SMA20 +13.0% / mo · MACD + · sector -4.6pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 82
Sector RS: 31
Sector 3M: -10.2% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Consumer FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

GUJRAFFIAD candles · FIT view+28.5%
Latest close ₹53.18 on 2026-10-21
Bar
-5.0%
RSI
60
MACD hist
1.44
52W pos
34%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹55.95H ₹55.95L ₹53.18C ₹53.18Vol 7,692 sh
₹33.43₹42.69₹51.94₹61.20₹70.4652L₹53.182026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

GUJRAFFIANifty Consumer DurablesNifty 500
-19%+12%+42%+72%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026GUJRAFFIA +35.4%Nifty Consumer Durabl… -11.0%Nifty 500 -6.5%
GUJRAFFIA
+35.4%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Consumer Durables
-11.0%
Vs Nifty 500
+41.8 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-39.6%
₹88
52W range position
34%
₹35.1 - ₹88
ATR (14)
7.1%
₹3.8
Volume vs 20D
0.12x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.4 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹39 - ₹68.8
106.0% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
28

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
7

Revenue -18.5% · PAT +38.2% YoY

Technical
Bullish
61

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-375.4%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
77

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 7/100

Rev -18% YoY · margin compression · PAT +38% YoY · operating leverage

Filed 13 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹9.4 Cr-18.5%-65.2%
EBITDA₹0.9 Cr-19.8%+19.2%
Operating margin9.9%-17 bps+701 bps
PAT₹0.5 Cr+38.2%+14.6%
PAT margin5.0%+206 bps+349 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
18.40
P/B
0.98
EV/EBITDA
5.39
Market Cap
21.80Cr

Profitability

ROE
3.69%
ROCE
5.49%
ROA
4.26%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
18.00%
EPS 5Y
-5.00%
Revenue 3Y
31.00%
EPS 3Y
29.66%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.08
Interest Coverage
12.50×
Altman Z
6.84
Book Value
41.10

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
13.12%
FCF Positive Y
9/5
OCF
4.90 Cr
EPS TTM
2.18

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
39.60%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
9%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 9.4-65.2% vs prev
027.0Sep 2023: 7.6Dec 2023: 7.2Mar 2024: 7.1Jun 2024: 10.5Sep 2024: 5.5Dec 2024: 6.1Mar 2025: 8.0Jun 2025: 11.5Sep 2025: 26.1Dec 2025: 23.9Mar 2026: 27.0Jun 2026: 9.4Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 0.5+14.6% vs prev
00.5Sep 2023: 0.1Dec 2023: 0.2Mar 2024: 0.1Jun 2024: 0.3Sep 2024: 0.1Dec 2024: 0.1Mar 2025: 0.1Jun 2025: 0.3Sep 2025: 0.2Dec 2025: 0.1Mar 2026: 0.4Jun 2026: 0.5Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bullish setup

Trend is constructive — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 60.

  • Price > SMA20 > SMA50 > SMA200 — full bullish stack.
  • Recent golden cross (SMA50 crossed above SMA200).
  • SMA20 rising (~11.5% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 60 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 40% off 52W high · 52% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

67
RS percentile
Stage 2 UptrendRecent S2
1M return
+31.9%
3M return
+35.4%
6M return
+25.9%
1Y return
-28.0%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
+11
Sector rank
#8
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is 29.4% above the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is above the 30-week proxy and its slope is rising +2.7%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are positive.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price above
S2 entered
13 Oct 2026
S2 age
6 trading sessions
Sector
neutral
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 143.9-4.10%
87121154188221Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 26144
RS vs Nifty 500144

Valuation & peers

U-Score 28 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

28U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation4/30
Growth5/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet11/15
Cash Flow10/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
28

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

28/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 13.1%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Cash flow contributes 10/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -375.4%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
18.4
PB
1.0
EV/EBITDA
5.4
ROE
3.7%
ROCE
5.5%
FCF Yield
13.1%
Debt/Equity
0.1
MoS
-375.4%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
28
Previous: 28
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-375.4%
Previous: -400.4%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
33
33
33
30
29
28
28
28
28
28
28
28

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹44.9
-18.4% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
5.1
Growth-justified Value
₹11.18
-375.4% MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
HITECHCORP
Small
Hitech Corporation Limited
Packaging
match 58
28
30.9
5.8%
-66%
OVERVALUED
ROLLT
Small
Rollatainers Limited
Packaging
match 58
30
—
-73.8%
+81%
OVERVALUED
WORTHPERI
Small
Worth Peripherals Limited
Packaging
match 58
34
14.6
8.1%
-76%
WATCHLIST
AMDIND
Small
AMD Industries Limited
Packaging
match 58
22
99.6
-4.3%
-126%
OVERVALUED
PYRAMID
Small
Pyramid Technoplast Limited
Packaging
match 57
42
18.1
11.0%
+60%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Gujarat Raffia Industries Limited operates in Packaging, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
77Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 83rd percentile of the scored universe and 87th percentile within Consumer. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 40/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
83rd percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 87th pctile, median 66 · Small: 86th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
82
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 12.8%.
  • ▸9 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.08.

Trust risks

  • ▸ROCE is low at 6.4%.
  • ▸ROE is low at 4.8%.
  • ▸2 older quarters in the 8-quarter window had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

5 shown
AnnouncementSep 2026

Sep 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Appointment of Statutory Auditor/s 7 Sep - M/s. MAPPS & CO. appointed statutory auditor on 07 Sep 2026 for 5 years, subject to AGM ratification.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual report

Reg. 34 (1) Annual Report. 7 Sep

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementAug 2026

Aug 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Resignation of Statutory Auditors 14 Aug - KPSJ & Associates LLP resigned as statutory auditor effective 14 August 2026; board will appoint replacement.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Annual Report 2026

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2025

Mar 2025 · Annual Report 2025

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.