IP
IndiaPulse

Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Limited (GMDCLTD)

Small Cap

Metals stocks · Small cap · NSE

Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Limited (GMDC) is a Government of Gujarat enterprise engaged in mining lignite, bauxite, and developing coal, copper, and rare earth elements. The company aims for significant growth through new projects and capacity expansion across its mineral portfolio.

₹562.95
-2.90 · -0.51%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Metals P/E 20.4 (n=89)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
WATCHLIST
35

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
74

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
45

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
41

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 2/100

PAT -1% YoY · margin compression · Rev +24% YoY · +11% QoQ

Filed 31 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹907 Cr+23.7%+11.4%
EBITDA₹191 Cr+13.0%+83.7%
Operating margin21.0%-200 bps+800 bps
PAT₹163 Cr-0.6%-16.0%
PAT margin18.0%-440 bps-586 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-16T07:13:59.917Z
Management commentary snapshot

GMDC reports steady growth in Q4 & FY'25, but faces project delays in lignite and power, while maintaining ambitious long-term targets for coal and critical minerals.

GMDC's ambitious 'Project Shikhar' for 2030 faces short-term execution challenges with lignite volume shortfalls and power plant delays due to external factors. While management remains confident in achieving long-term targets, the consistent slippage in timelines for key projects warrants close monitoring of ground-breaking and ramp-up schedules.

Growth engines

New Lignite Mines

positive

Six new lignite mines with 12 MTPA capacity are under development, with Lakhpat, Walia, and Damlai expected to deliver major volumes from FY'27 onwards.

Baitarani West Coal Mine

positive

Expected to be GMDC's largest mine (15 MTPA), with groundbreaking and potential initial volumes in FY'26, ramping up quickly to 1-3-5 million tons.

Copper Project Ambaji

positive

Renamed from multi-metal project, this underground mine is a 'true value driver' with significant activity expected in the coming two years, contributing from FY'28.

Rare Earth Elements Business

positive

Steady work is continuing after receiving an LOI, with commercialization expected in a few years, focusing on permanent magnets.

Capacity and execution

New Lignite Mines

neutral

Six new lignite mines with 12 MTPA capacity are undergoing statutory clearances; volumes from larger ones (Lakhpat, Walia, Damlai) expected from FY'27.

Baitarani West Coal Mine

positive

Peak capacity of 15 MTPA, with potential to go up to 22.5 MTPA. Initial production target of ~1 MT in first year of operation, ramping to 3 MT and 5 MT quickly.

ATPS Power Plant Overhaul

neutral

Plant overhaul is underway due to critical delays in spares. New PPA allows pass-through of CAPEX and aims for profitability.

Tailwinds

Lignite Demand

positive

Market surveys and analysis indicate continued demand for lignite as a relevant fuel, competing with domestic and imported coal.

Favorable Stripping Ratio for Coal

positive

Odisha coal mines have a near 1.5 units stripping ratio, allowing faster production ramp-up after groundbreaking compared to Gujarat lignite.

New Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)

positive

New PPA for ATPS plant incentivizes maintenance and upgrades, allowing CAPEX pass-through and aiming for fixed returns.

Headwinds

Lignite Production Shortfall

negative

FY'25 lignite production fell short of 10 MT target, ending at 8 MT, due to Rajpardi mine safety incident and Bhavnagar land acquisition delays.

Power Plant Delays

negative

ATPS power plant is running behind schedule due to critical delays in certain spares from abroad and additional surprises requiring more spares.

Long Gestation for New Projects

negative

New lignite mines and the underground copper project have long gestation periods due to statutory clearances, land acquisition, and complex development.

Risk radar

Project Execution Delays

negative

Projects spread over hundreds of hectares with human settlements involved can experience 'a few quarters here or there' shifts due to land and R&R issues.

Underground Mining Complexity

negative

Copper Project Ambaji is GMDC's first underground mine in Western India, requiring significant CAPEX, technical work, and 2-3 years for results.

CAPEX Concentration

neutral

The Rs. 13,000 crore CAPEX till 2030 may get concentrated in 2 years, potentially requiring slightly more debt than planned if land/R&R issues resolve quickly.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare YOY

The earnings call primarily discusses annual performance, multi-year project timelines, and long-term growth plans (FY'26, FY'27, 2030, 2035). Annual comparisons are more relevant for assessing progress against these strategic objectives and project execution milestones.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Lignite Production (FY'25)

negative

Company fell short of 10 million ton target, ending at 8 million tons due to Rajpardi mine closure and Bhavnagar land acquisition delays.

Lignite Volume Growth (FY'26)

positive

Management targets 10% to 15% growth in existing lignite business from four operational mines.

Lignite Pricing/Margins

neutral

Analyst calculated Q4 pricing around Rs. 3,400 per ton with EBITDA of Rs. 800-890 per ton. Company sells lignite at 10-15% discount to Indonesian coal.

Baitarani West Coal Mine Capacity

positive

Largest mine for GMDC with a capacity of 15 million tons per annum, potentially expandable to 22.5 million tons.

Management forward view

Ambitious Growth Aspiration

positive

Aspiration is to grow to 7%-8%-10% of Coal India's size, aiming for lignite production of 15 MT by 2035 and coal production of 15 MTPA by 2030.

Project Shikhar 2030 Target

neutral

Management 'holds on to our numbers' for the Rs. 14,500 crore revenue target by 2030, despite acknowledging 'a few quarters here or there' shifts.

Beyond Gujarat Sales for Lignite

positive

Company plans to initiate efforts towards beyond Gujarat sales for lignite in the current year, preparing for ramp-up capacity from new mines.

Debt Financing Comfort

positive

Company is comfortable with CAPEX financing, having Rs. 2,000 crore reserves and a line of credit from state lending authorities. No debt expected until FY'27 end.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Lignite Volume Growth8 MT in FY'25 (below 10 MT target)Achievement of 10-15% growth from existing mines in FY'26 and initial contributions from new mines (Lakhpat, Walia, Damlai) from FY'27.
Baitarani West Coal Mine Groundbreaking/ProductionPayments for land underway, groundbreaking expected this year.Confirmation of groundbreaking in FY'26 and initial volume contribution (target ~1 MT) in the same year.
ATPS Power Plant CommissioningRunning behind schedule due to critical spares delays.Successful overhaul completion and plant commissioning, leading to improved profitability and reduced losses.
CAPEX Spend RateFY'25 CAPEX was Rs. 644 crore (below Rs. 3,000 crore plan).Acceleration of CAPEX towards the planned Rs. 1,500-2,000 crore annual range, especially for land and R&R, and potential debt intake by FY'27 end.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

45Neutral

full bear SMA stack · MACD − · sector +2.7pp vs Nifty (3M)

Stock trend: 33
Sector RS: 64
Sector 3M: +1.2% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

GMDCLTDdaily · 1Y · AUTO+3.3%
Latest close ₹562.95 on 2026-09-04
Bar
-0.6%
RSI
45
MACD hist
-0.47
52W pos
32%
2026-09-04O ₹566.20H ₹570.75L ₹561.00C ₹562.95Vol 5.0L sh
₹510.56₹579.00₹647.45₹715.90₹784.3552H562.952026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Neutral

Trend is undirectional — long-term trend down. RSI 45.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 roughly flat — short-term momentum stalled.
  • RSI(14) at 45 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 27% off 52W high · 21% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

48
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-3.4%
3M return
-10.3%
6M return
+1.3%
1Y return
+2.7%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
-20
Sector rank
#5
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 6.9% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +0.2% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
improving
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 132.29-0.51%
94117139162184Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 26132
RS vs Nifty 500132

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 35 · WATCHLIST · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

35U-SCORE
WATCHLIST

Fundamental score breakdown

WATCHLIST
Valuation3/30
Growth10/25
Quality1/20
Balance Sheet12/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
35

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

35/100 · WATCHLIST

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Balance sheet contributes 12/15 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 10/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Quality is weaker at 1/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 3/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 10/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
31.4
PB
2.5
EV/EBITDA
30.8
ROE
8.3%
ROCE
10.8%
FCF Yield
0.7%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+4.3%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
35
Previous: 35
Verdict
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
+4.3%
Previous: +4.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
36
36
36
36
36
35
36
36
36
36
35
35

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹387.56
-45.3% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
19.6
Growth-justified Value
₹587.87
+4.3% MoS
PEG
3.93

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
74Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 75th percentile of the scored universe and 75th percentile within Metals. Main check: results consistency is weak at 41/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 74%. Key concern: 1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
27 docs text-extracted · 20 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
75th percentile

overall median 67 · Metals: 75th pctile, median 70 · Small: 77th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

27 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
41
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 74%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 0.7%.
  • 11 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • 1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
31.40
P/B
2.54
EV/EBITDA
30.83
Market Cap
17902.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
8.34%
ROCE
10.80%
ROA
10.64%
Dividend Y
1.79%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
15.00%
EPS 5Y
8.00%
Revenue 3Y
-9.00%
EPS 3Y
-22.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.04
Interest Coverage
35.77×
Altman Z
7.49
Book Value
222.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.73%
FCF Positive Y
11/5
OCF
744.00 Cr
EPS TTM
30.07

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
74.00%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
32%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Metals, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.