IP
IndiaPulse

The Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited (GESHIP)

Small Cap

Services stocks · Small cap · NSE

The Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited (GESHIP) is India's largest shipping and oilfield services provider. It operates a diversified fleet of 39 vessels (crude, product, gas carriers, dry bulk) and 23 offshore assets (4 jack-up rigs, 19 OSVs), serving global and domestic markets.

₹1,369.7
+16.10 · +1.19%
Quote04 Sept, 03:58 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Services P/E 17.5 (n=141)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Strong fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Candidate for deeper work
Valuation is strong. Wait for stronger Trust evidence before treating this as high conviction.
U-Score
DEEP VALUE
85

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
80

low confidence · 0/8 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
53

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
stable
72

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Excellent · 100/100

Rev +67% YoY · PAT +160% YoY · margin expansion · +33% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹2,005 Cr+66.9%+32.7%
EBITDA₹1,338 Cr+108.1%+42.2%
Operating margin67.0%+1300 bps+500 bps
PAT₹1,309 Cr+159.7%+25.4%
PAT margin65.3%+2332 bps-380 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-05T17:39:01.586Z
Management commentary snapshot

GESHIP reports highest ever Q4 and FY26 standalone net profit, declares record quarterly dividend. Strong freight rates across most segments and strategic fleet management drive robust financial performance and NAV growth.

The company delivered record profits and dividends, supported by elevated freight rates in key segments and a strong balance sheet. Strategic fleet additions and a low global orderbook for new vessels suggest continued favorable market dynamics, despite some trade volume declines due to geopolitical events.

Growth engines

Strong Freight Rate Environment

Elevated earnings across crude, product, dry bulk, and LPG segments, driven by fleet inefficiencies and robust demand in specific trade lanes.

Low Global Orderbook

Orderbook for crude (22%), product (19%), and dry bulk (13%) tankers remains low as a percentage of the existing fleet, supporting future freight rates.

Aging Global Fleet

A significant portion of the global fleet (Crude 23%, Product 20%, Dry Bulk 13%, LPG 28% are 20+ years old) indicates potential for increased scrapping, tightening supply.

Strategic Fleet Management

The company actively manages its fleet through timely purchases of modern vessels and sales of older tonnage, enhancing operational efficiency and asset value.

Capacity and execution

Vessel Purchases in 4Q26

Added 1 VLGC (Jag Vijay, 2015 built), 1 Ultramax (Jag Riddhi, 2019 built), and 1 MR Tanker (Jag Pranesh, 2013 built) to the fleet.

Vessel Purchases in 1Q27-QTD

Added 1 Kamsarmax (Jag Abhishek, 2019 built) to the fleet.

Contracted Purchases

Contracted to buy 1 secondhand MR Tanker, expected to be executed in Q1 FY27.

Vessel Sales in 4Q26

Removed 1 Kamsarmax (Jag Aarati, 2011 built) and 1 VLGC (Jag Vishnu, 2002 built) from the fleet.

Tailwinds

Robust US Exports

Higher US refinery utilizations enabled robust product exports (+22% YoY in Q4 FY26), and strong US grain exports drove ton-mile demand.

Fleet Inefficiencies

Idling of vessels (especially VLCCs) and increased waiting times at the Panama Canal contributed to elevated crude and LPG tanker earnings.

Strong Arbitrage on US-Far East Route

A significantly stronger arbitrage on the U.S.–Far East route allowed LPG freight markets to capture a larger share of the value chain, boosting earnings.

Headwinds

Middle East Conflict Impact

Global dirty trade volumes dropped 2% YoY in Q4 FY26, with a 15% YoY drop in March 2026, primarily due to the Middle East conflict impacting exports.

Declining Trade Volumes

Total seaborne product trade declined 3% YoY in Q4 FY26, and overall LPG trade volumes were down 5% YoY, mainly due to Middle East export declines.

Risk radar

Geopolitical Instability

Ongoing conflicts, particularly in the Middle East, can disrupt trade routes, reduce cargo volumes, and introduce volatility in freight markets.

High LPG Orderbook

The VLGC orderbook-to-fleet ratio remains elevated at 28%, potentially leading to increased supply and pressure on freight rates in the future.

Global Economic Slowdown

A slowdown in global economic activity could reduce demand for seaborne trade, impacting freight rates across all segments.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Dec 2025
Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

Both YoY and QoQ comparisons are crucial. YoY reflects the significant improvement in freight markets over the past year, while QoQ captures sequential momentum in rates, fleet changes, and the immediate impact of market events like the Middle East conflict.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Crude Tanker Earnings (Suezmax)

FY26 average Suezmax earnings were USD 74,377/day, a 92% YoY increase. Q4 FY26 company-specific Crude Carrier TCYs were USD 61,424/day, up 98% YoY and 30% QoQ.

Product Tanker Earnings (MR)

FY26 average MR earnings were USD 28,014/day, a 10% YoY increase. Q4 FY26 company-specific Product Carrier TCYs were USD 30,511/day, up 23% YoY and 21% QoQ.

LPG Carrier Earnings (VLGC)

FY26 average VLGC earnings were USD 53,806/day, a 61% YoY increase. Q4 FY26 VLGC spot earnings grew 145% YoY. Company-specific LPG Carrier TCYs were USD 45,216/day, up 4% YoY and 4% QoQ.

Dry Bulk Carrier Earnings (Capesize)

FY26 average Capesize earnings were USD 23,891/day, a 22% YoY increase. Q4 FY26 bulk carrier earnings were significantly higher YoY across all segments. Company-specific Dry Bulk TCYs were USD 16,678/day, up 35% YoY.

Management forward view

Record Financial Performance

Management highlighted the highest ever standalone net profit for Q4 and FY26, and the highest quarterly dividend declared for 4Q26.

Strong Balance Sheet

The company maintains a strong balance sheet, transitioning from a peak net debt of USD 361mn to a current net cash position of USD 516mn (normalized).

Consistent Shareholder Returns

Declared 17th consecutive quarterly dividend, demonstrating a commitment to shareholder returns.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Crude Tanker Time Charter Equivalent (TCY) RatesUSD 61,424/day (Q4 FY26)Sustained high rates or further increases, indicating strong demand and tight supply.
LPG Carrier TCY RatesUSD 45,216/day (Q4 FY26)Impact of high orderbook on future rates, especially as new vessels are delivered.
Global Trade VolumesDeclined in Q4 FY26 for crude, product, and LPGRecovery in trade volumes, particularly from the Middle East, and continued strength in US exports.
Offshore Jackup Rig Utilization75% (Mar-26)Further improvement in utilization rates and day rates for offshore assets.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Show extracted source claims
capex timelinenot yet verifiablequantified

Two 20-year-old tankers (Jag Lok and Jag Pooja) are committed for delivery in the current quarter.

Timeframe: Q3 FY26Direction: neutralConfidence: high

"both of which will be delivered in this quarter"

capex timelinenot yet verifiablequantified

The company's first purchased Ultramax bulk carrier is scheduled to be delivered by Q4 FY26.

Timeframe: Q4 FY26Direction: positiveConfidence: high

"purchased our first Ultramax bulk carrier which will be delivered by Q4 FY26"

operational efficiencynot yet verifiablequantified

The company intends to maintain a fleet size of at least 40 ships by continuing its switch strategy of selling older ships and buying newer ones.

Timeframe: FutureDirection: neutralConfidence: high

"would not like to ideally drop below this 40-odd ships"

project executionnot yet verifiablequantified

Additional rigs are scheduled for contract renewals and repricing in H1 FY27 and H2 FY27 (around January 2027).

Timeframe: H1 FY27 and H2 FY27Direction: neutralConfidence: high

"another rig coming up in H1 FY27 and we have a third rig coming up in H2 FY27"

project executionnot yet verifiablequantified

One of the active rigs is on a four-month contract ending in February 2026, which will require repricing and finding new work.

Timeframe: February 2026Direction: neutralConfidence: high

"four-month contract which ends in February"

project executionnot yet verifiablequantified

The fourth rig is being mobilized for a seven-month contract off the coast of India and is expected to go on hire by the end of November 2025.

Timeframe: End of November 2025Direction: positiveConfidence: medium

"should hopefully go on higher by end of November"

margin outlooknot yet verifiable

Lumpy expenditures required to prepare the rigs for new contracts will mainly occur in the coming two quarters.

Timeframe: Q3 FY26 and Q4 FY26Direction: negativeConfidence: high

"It will mainly come in the coming two quarters."

revenue outlooknot yet verifiable

The company does not expect significant financial contribution from the rigs during the contract preparation period in Q3 and Q4 FY26.

Timeframe: Q3 FY26 and Q4 FY26Direction: negativeConfidence: medium

"would not expect too much contribution from the rigs in this period"

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

53Neutral

SMA20 -5.5% / mo · MACD +

Stock trend: 54
Sector RS: 51
Sector 3M: -1.2% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

GESHIPdaily · 1Y · AUTO-1.4%
Latest close ₹1369.70 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+0.7%
RSI
55
MACD hist
8.56
52W pos
50%
2026-09-04O ₹1360.40H ₹1378.00L ₹1340.00C ₹1369.70Vol 10.4L sh
₹1.20k₹1.36k₹1.52k₹1.67k₹1.83k52H1369.702026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 55. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 falling (~5.8% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 55 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 24% off 52W high · 44% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

66
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
+2.1%
3M return
-5.0%
6M return
-7.9%
1Y return
+29.4%
RS 1D
-4
RS 20D
-7
Sector rank
#7
Industry rank
#11
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 3.4% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +1.5% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price above
Sector
weakening
Industry
weakening
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 136.49+1.19%
92114136158181Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 26136
RS vs Nifty 500136

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 85 · DEEP VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

85U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

DEEP VALUE
Valuation30/30
Growth19/25
Quality11/20
Balance Sheet12/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
85

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

85/100 · DEEP VALUE

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 10.2%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 80.1%.

Main drags

  • Quality is weaker at 11/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 19/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 12/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
5.2
PB
1.1
EV/EBITDA
4.3
ROE
15.9%
ROCE
15.8%
FCF Yield
10.2%
Debt/Equity
0.1
MoS
+80.1%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE. Current PE is low at 5.2, so peak-cycle earnings risk should be checked.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
85
Previous: 85
Verdict
DEEP VALUE
Previous: DEEP VALUE
Margin of safety
+80.1%
Previous: +80.1%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
83
83
84
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹2,648.59
+48.3% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
26.3
Growth-justified Value
₹6,889.05
+80.1% MoS
PEG
0.27

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
80Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 90th percentile of the scored universe and 93rd percentile within Services. No major sub-score weakness stands out.

High Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: OPM spread across recent quarters is 26%.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
176 docs text-extracted · 60 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
90th percentile

overall median 67 · Services: 93rd pctile, median 66 · Small: 92nd pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

176 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

8 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
72
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is 10.2%.
  • 11 years of positive FCF.
  • Debt/equity is 0.06.

Trust risks

  • OPM spread across recent quarters is 26%.
  • 2 older quarters in the 8-quarter window had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
5.22
P/B
1.15
EV/EBITDA
4.33
Market Cap
19555.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
15.90%
ROCE
15.80%
ROA
19.25%
Dividend Y
2.56%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
10.00%
EPS 5Y
24.00%
Revenue 3Y
-2.00%
EPS 3Y
12.75%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.06
Interest Coverage
34.62×
Altman Z
7.19
Book Value
1188.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
10.20%
FCF Positive Y
11/5
OCF
2854.00 Cr
EPS TTM
262.44

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
30.08%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
50%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Services, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.