Skip to content

Generic Engineering Construction and Projects Limited (GENCON)

Small Cap

Infra stocks · Small cap · NSE

Generic Engineering Construction and Projects Limited operates in Construction, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹26.5
-2.05 · -7.18%
Market cap ₹221 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 05:57 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 05:57 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result25 Jun, 10:21 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Infra P/E 15.4 (n=87)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

28Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -14.7% / mo · RSI oversold · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -2.2pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 22
Sector RS: 38
Sector 3M: -7.9% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Infra FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

GENCOND candles · FIT view-36.5%
Latest close ₹26.50 on 2026-10-21
Bar
-8.1%
RSI
19
MACD hist
-0.98
52W pos
1%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹28.85H ₹28.85L ₹26.19C ₹26.50Vol 3.1L sh
₹25.11₹31.06₹37.02₹42.98₹48.9352L₹26.502026-03VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

GENCONNifty InfraNifty 500
-39%-18%+3%+24%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026GENCON -33.4%Nifty Infra -8.6%Nifty 500 -6.5%
GENCON
-33.4%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Infra
-8.6%
Vs Nifty 500
-26.9 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-55.8%
₹60
52W range position
1%
₹26.2 - ₹60
ATR (14)
9.3%
₹2.5
Volume vs 20D
0.70x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹1.6 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹26.2 - ₹41.2
63.5% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
24

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue +4.1% · PAT -69.6% YoY

Technical
Bearish
28

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-181.9%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
62

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -70% YoY · margin compression · Rev +4% YoY · +38% QoQ

Filed 25 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹111.2 Cr+4.1%+38.0%
EBITDA₹7.5 CrNDF-24.4%
Operating margin6.8%NDF-558 bps
PAT₹1.9 Cr-69.6%-23.2%
PAT margin1.7%NDF-135 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
26.00
P/B
0.75
EV/EBITDA
5.94
Market Cap
221.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
2.94%
ROCE
7.10%
ROA
1.54%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-2.00%
EPS 5Y
-2.00%
Revenue 3Y
-6.00%
EPS 3Y
-6.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.22
Interest Coverage
3.09×
Altman Z
2.31
Book Value
51.40

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
4.52%
FCF Positive Y
2/5
OCF
24.00 Cr
EPS TTM
1.49

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
40.30%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
23%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 111+38.0% vs prev
0111.2Dec 2024: 93.3Mar 2025: 107Jun 2025: 52.0Sep 2025: 61.6Dec 2025: 80.6Mar 2026: 111Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 1.9-23.2% vs prev
06.2Dec 2024: 1.8Mar 2025: 6.2Jun 2025: 2.0Sep 2025: 2.1Dec 2025: 2.5Mar 2026: 1.9Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 19.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~17.2% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 19 — oversold zone; bounce conditions.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

9
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-34.6%
3M return
-33.4%
6M return
-37.4%
1Y return
-38.0%
RS 1D
-3
RS 20D
-36
Sector rank
#17
Industry rank
#68
Stage evidence
  • Price is 34.5% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -3.0%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 65.75-6.31%
6282101121140Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2666
RS vs Nifty 50066

Valuation & peers

U-Score 24 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

24U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation11/30
Growth1/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet7/15
Cash Flow5/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
24

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

24/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 4.5%.
  • Cash flow contributes 5/10 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 7/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -181.9%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
26.0
PB
0.8
EV/EBITDA
5.9
ROE
2.9%
ROCE
7.1%
FCF Yield
4.5%
Debt/Equity
0.2
MoS
-181.9%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
24
Previous: 21 (+3)
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-181.9%
Previous: -203.7%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
21
21
21
21
21

Factor attribution

Valuation
11+3
was 8

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹41.51
+36.2% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
6.3
Growth-justified Value
₹9.4
-181.9% MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Infra — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
TARMAT
Small
Tarmat Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 90
20
19.9
3.0%
-132%
OVERVALUED
VPRPL
Small
Vishnu Prakash R Punglia Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 88
24
—
-19.9%
—
OVERVALUED
DBEIL
Small
Deepak Builders & Engineers India Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 87
56
11.0
9.2%
+54%
FAIR VALUE
CCCL
Small
Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 85
26
—
-4.3%
—
OVERVALUED
GIRIRAJ
SME
Giriraj Civil Developers Ltd.
Construction & Engineering
match 80
56
7.4
10.9%
+69%
FAIR VALUE

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Generic Engineering Construction and Projects Limited operates in Construction, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
62Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 35th percentile of the scored universe and 43rd percentile within Infra. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 40/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
16 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
35th percentile

overall median 67 · Infra: 43rd pctile, median 64 · Small: 40th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

16 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
65
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
73
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
48
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is positive at 3.9%.

Trust risks

  • ▸ROCE is low at 7.1%.
  • ▸ROE is low at 2.9%.
  • ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

3 shown
AnnouncementJun 2026

Jun 2026 · Copy Of Newspaper Publication 29 May

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementJun 2026

Jun 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Resignation of Company Secretary / Compliance Officer 2 Jun - Mrs. Simran Agrawal resigned as Company Secretary and Compliance Officer effective 1 June 2026.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.