Frontier Springs Limited (FRONTSP)
Small CapIndustrials stocks · Small cap · NSE
Frontier Springs Limited operates in Springs, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Investable fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026
Bad · 0/100PAT -20% YoY · margin compression · Rev +4% YoY
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹78 Cr | +4.0% | -6.0% |
| EBITDA | ₹19 Cr | -5.0% | -20.8% |
| Operating margin | 25.0% | -200 bps | -400 bps |
| PAT | ₹12 Cr | -20.0% | -29.4% |
| PAT margin | 15.4% | -462 bps | -510 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Issuer presentation review pending
Frontier Springs Limited operates in Springs, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Trend score and candlestick chart
45NeutralSMA20 -5.3% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low
Technical chart
FRONTSPdaily · 1Y · AUTO-14.6%Daily history is available from 2026-04-20; the requested 1Y window is partially covered.
Daily technical trend read
Mixed signalsSignals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 46. Wait for confirmation.
- SMA20 falling (~5.6% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 46 — rising, no extreme reading.
- MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
- Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 70 · UNDERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 70 · UNDERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Fundamental score breakdown
UNDERVALUEDWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 34.2%.
- Growth contributes 25/25 to the score.
Main drags
- Valuation is weaker at 7/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Cash flow is weaker at 4/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Balance sheet is weaker at 8/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks
For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +46 points.
Factor attribution
Modelled fair value
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 93rd percentile of the scored universe and 92nd percentile within Industrials. No major sub-score weakness stands out.
High Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero.
Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.
overall median 67 · Industrials: 92nd pctile, median 68 · Small: 95th pctile, median 66
44 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Healthy Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸7 years of positive FCF.
- ▸Debt/equity is 0.06.
- ▸ROCE is 50.6%.
Trust risks
- ▸No major Trust Lite risk flags.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 26.00
- P/B
- 8.34
- EV/EBITDA
- 17.08
- Market Cap
- 1526.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 39.20%
- ROCE
- 50.60%
- ROA
- 27.06%
- Dividend Y
- 0.05%
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 33.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 51.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 44.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 103.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.06
- Interest Coverage
- —
- Altman Z
- 10.19
- Book Value
- 155.00
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 7/5
- OCF
- 31.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 49.61
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 51.76%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 17%
Financial History
Updated 5/9/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable names in Industrials, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable names in Industrials, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable peers in Industrials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.