Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Analyst / Investor Meet - Intimation 14 Oct
Source: Bse
Financial Services stocks · Small cap · NSE
Five-Star Business Finance Limited is an NBFC providing secured financial solutions to small business customers and self-employed individuals with informal incomes, largely cut-off from the formal lending ecosystem. All loans are secured against borrower property, typically self-occupied residential property. The company operates 844 branches across 11 states/UTs.
SMA20 -3.0% / mo · MACD −
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue +5.3% · PAT +1.9% YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Rev +5% YoY · PAT +2% YoY
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹829 Cr | +5.3% | +1.5% |
| EBITDA | NDF | NDF | NDF |
| Operating margin | NDF | NDF | NDF |
| PAT | ₹271 Cr | +1.9% | +0.7% |
| PAT margin | 32.7% | -111 bps | -24 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 20/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Trend is undirectional — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 43.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 27 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Q4FY26 PAT declined 4% YoY and 3% QoQ, while AUM grew 11% YoY and 2% QoQ. Asset quality deteriorated with GNPA rising to 3.37% (vs 1.79% YoY) and credit cost surging 138% YoY.
Despite management's claim that 'the worst is behind us' and strong collection efficiency, the significant deterioration in asset quality metrics (GNPA, NNPA, credit cost) and flat to declining profitability (PAT, RoE) in Q4FY26 raises concerns. The company's ability to achieve its ambitious AUM growth target while simultaneously improving asset quality and profitability remains a key challenge.
Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 7 reported categories.
Management is 'geared to get back on the track of growth' and 'well-poised to achieve AUM growth of around 20% for FY27 and thereafter'.
Company aims for strong, sustainable growth, quality, and profitability through 'robust credit underwriting, strong collections, and proactive risk management'.
Growth and risk management will be 'backed by use of appropriate technology and AI', including ML models for risk scoring and GenAI for document processing and voice bots.
9 branches were opened during Q4FY26, bringing the total to 844 branches.
Q4FY26 unique customer collection efficiency (excluding NPA loans) was 98.1%, 'one of the best in the history of the Company'.
Slippage ratio dropped from 1.09% in Q3FY26 to 0.70% in Q4FY26, helping contain NPA levels.
Company aims for growth supported by a 'diversified and cost-effective funding profile'. Book COF dropped ~70 bps during FY26.
GNPA increased to 3.37% in Q4FY26 from 1.79% in Q4FY25. NNPA rose to 2.00% from 0.88% over the same period.
Credit cost to average AUM increased significantly to 1.88% in Q4FY26 from 0.90% in Q4FY25, impacting profitability.
PAT declined 4% YoY and 3% QoQ in Q4FY26. Return on Equity (RoE) for FY26 was 16.06% vs 18.68% in FY25.
Management noted 'Senior Management exit that we saw during the year has had no impact on our performance', indicating past instability.
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
For an NBFC, both year-on-year (YoY) and quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) comparisons are crucial. YoY provides a view on overall growth and seasonal trends, while QoQ highlights sequential momentum in disbursements, asset quality, and profitability, which are vital for assessing operational performance and credit cycle shifts.
Q4FY26 AUM was ₹132,246 Mn, up 11% YoY and 2% QoQ. FY26 AUM grew 11% YoY.
Q4FY26 disbursements were ₹12,133 Mn, down 17% YoY and up 24% QoQ. FY26 disbursements were ₹46,757 Mn, down 6% YoY.
Q4FY26 NIM was 20.07% (vs 20.72% YoY, 19.57% QoQ). FY26 NIM was 19.86% (vs 20.46% YoY).
Q4FY26 cost of borrowing was 8.95% (vs 9.63% YoY, 9.12% QoQ). FY26 cost of borrowing was 9.21% (vs 9.64% YoY).
Management believes 'the worst is behind us and there is only one direction that we will be moving in, in the coming years'.
Company is 'well-poised to achieve AUM growth of around 20% for FY27 and thereafter'.
Management will 'aim at achieving strong yet sustainable growth, quality and profitability'.
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| AUM Growth | 11% YoY (FY26) | Progress towards 20% AUM growth target for FY27. |
| Gross NPA | 3.37% (Q4FY26) | Stabilization or reduction in GNPA and slippage ratios, indicating asset quality improvement. |
| Credit Cost | 1.88% (Q4FY26) | Moderation in credit costs, which have significantly impacted profitability. |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 20.07% (Q4FY26) | Maintenance or improvement in NIM, supported by stable yields and declining cost of funds. |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 28th percentile of the scored universe and 45th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 28/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Financial Services: 45th pctile, median 62 · Small: 32nd pctile, median 66
84 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse