IP
IndiaPulse

Finbud Financial Services Ltd. (FINBUD)

SME Cap

Financial Services stocks · SME cap · NSE

FinBud Financial Services Ltd. operates an integrated retail-credit franchise across offline distribution, data, digital origination (Zap), and lending (Equall). It leverages a decade-old agent network and a 5 Cr customer data base to drive growth across its multi-layered platform.

₹133
+5.00 · +3.91%
Quote04 Sept, 03:32 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags03 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Financial Services P/E 18.5 (n=240)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
WATCHLIST
42

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
64

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Bullish
64

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
mixed
63

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Average · 30/100

YoY data unavailable — classification deferred

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹177.1 CrNDFNDF
EBITDA₹9.2 Cr+15.3%+2.4%
Operating margin5.2%-179 bps-179 bps
PAT₹6.4 CrNDFNDF
PAT margin3.6%-54 bps-1 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-07-08T07:31:42.809Z
Management commentary snapshot

FY26 saw robust revenue growth of 42.2% YoY to INR 317.9 Cr, with PAT up 39% YoY to INR 11.6 Cr. Total disbursals crossed INR 10,250 Cr, driven by both agent and digital channels, marking a landmark year with IPO and new lending operations.

FinBud's integrated retail-credit franchise, leveraging distribution, data, digital, and now lending, appears to be compounding as claimed. The launch of Equall (NBFC) and scaling of Zap (digital) are key developments, with early metrics for Equall showing positive signals. The FY30 targets are ambitious but align with the stated strategy.

Current business mix

Revenue Mix FY26

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.

Businessmix
Agent86.0%
Digital14.0%
Growth engines

Agent Marketplace

Contributes 86% of group revenue, self-sustaining, cash-generative, and among India's top-5 retail-credit aggregators.

Data Engine

5 Cr funded and non-funded applications across 100+ lenders, forming a bureau-grade base that feeds Zap and Equall.

Digital Origination (Zap)

Higher margin, faster scale, with digital margins already 3x of agent business and targeting 5x at scale.

Lending (Equall)

NBFC live, lending against pre-selected, positively-selected risk from its own funnel, with RBI approval and industry-veteran leadership.

Capacity and execution

NBFC Launch (Equall)

RBI approved, operations live, first term loan approved, with a CEO confirmed by the regulator.

Digital Platform (Zap)

Spun into its own entity with dedicated leadership, consumer app live, and new categories like Gold Loan launched.

Agent Network Expansion

Pan-India network in 19,000+ pincodes, 15+ States, 50+ cities, 1000+ master agents, 50000+ last-mile agents.

Tailwinds

Digital PL Market Growth

India Digital PL disbursal is INR 4 L Cr, with small-ticket PL origination up ~35% over 2 years.

NBFC-Fintech Share Expansion

NBFC-Fintech share of PL outstanding increased from 16% to 19%.

AI-Native Execution

Internal AI-native execution compresses build cycles and cost-to-build, leading to lower technology cost-per-feature.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare YOY

The document presents annual financial results for FY26, making year-over-year comparison the most appropriate basis to assess overall performance and growth trends.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Total Disbursals FY26

INR 10,250+ Cr

Agent Disbursals FY26

INR 8,500+ Cr

Digital Disbursals FY26

INR 1,700 Cr

Equall FY30 AUM Ambition

INR 2,500+ Cr

Management forward view

FY30 Revenue Ambition

INR 1,000+ Cr total revenue, 3x today's run-rate.

Zap FY30 Targets

7x topline (to INR 300 Cr) and 13x bottom-line (to INR 65 Cr EBITDA), with EBITDA margin of 30%+.

Equall FY30 AUM Ambition

INR 2,500+ Cr AUM, scaled on top of loan aggregation.

Integrated Strategy

Sum of Parts Strategy to create a massively valuable consolidated franchise, with each layer compounding the next.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Zap Digital Market Share1.0% of India Digital PL disbursal.Progress towards FY30 target of 2.5%.
Zap Wallet Share9.6% across lead pool.Expansion towards FY30 target of 20% through repeats and lender coverage.
Equall AUM GrowthOn-book AUM ~INR 5.3 Cr (early stage).Ramp-up towards FY30 ambition of INR 2,500+ Cr and sustained low delinquency rates.
Equall Co-Lender Go-Live1st co-lender go-live June (DD complete); 2nd planned Aug/Sept.Successful execution and expansion of co-lending partnerships to scale the book.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

64Bullish

SMA20 +3.9% / mo · MACD −

Stock trend: 64
Sector RS:

Technical chart

FINBUDdaily · 1Y · AUTO+34.6%
Latest close ₹133.00 on 2026-09-04

Daily history is available from 2025-11-13; the requested 1Y window is partially covered.

Bar
+3.9%
RSI
50
MACD hist
-1.10
52W pos
64%
2026-09-04O ₹128.00H ₹133.10L ₹128.00C ₹133.00Vol 11,000 sh
₹72.25₹92.88₹113.50₹134.13₹154.7552L133.002026-03VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bullish setup

Trend is constructive — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 50.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 rising (~3.7% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 50 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 19% off 52W high · 75% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 42 · WATCHLIST · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

42U-SCORE
WATCHLIST

Fundamental score breakdown

WATCHLIST
Valuation5/30
Growth19/25
Quality9/20
Balance Sheet8/15
Cash Flow1/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
42

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

42/100 · WATCHLIST

Positive drivers

  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 21.7%.
  • Growth contributes 19/25 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 8/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 1/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 5/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

NBFC valuation: P/B, ROA, borrowing cost, and asset quality

Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.

NBFC P/B
Primary lens
P/B adjusted for ROA/ROE and leverage quality.
Secondary checks
AUM growth, spreads, credit cost, liquidity and ALM risk.
Main risk check
Fast growth with weak asset quality deserves a discount.
PE
21.8
PB
2.2
EV/EBITDA
13.8
ROE
15.4%
ROCE
17.8%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.2
MoS
+21.7%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
42
Previous: 42
Verdict
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
+21.7%
Previous: +21.7%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
52
52
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹91.35
-45.6% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
27.8
Growth-justified Value
₹169.83
+21.7% MoS
PEG
0.59

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
64Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 42nd percentile of the scored universe and 57th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 40/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-13 Cr.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
3 docs text-extracted · 2 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
42nd percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 57th pctile, median 62 · SME: 51st pctile, median 64

Evidence depth
Financial-only

3 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
40
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
89
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
58
watch · capital discipline
Results
63
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • OPM spread across recent quarters is 1.8%.

Trust risks

  • Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-13 Cr.
  • ROCE trend is -15.9%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
21.80
P/B
2.19
EV/EBITDA
13.80
Market Cap
253.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
15.40%
ROCE
17.80%
ROA
7.19%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
23.00%
EPS 5Y
23.00%
Revenue 3Y
33.00%
EPS 3Y
85.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.20
Interest Coverage
6.00×
Altman Z
6.22
Book Value
60.60

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
2/5
OCF
-13.00 Cr
EPS TTM
6.12

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
48.25%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
64%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Financial Services, ranked by similarity

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
IBLFL
SME
IBL Finance Ltd.
NBFC
match 157
14
58.8
4.1%
-111%
OVERVALUED
DCCL
SME
Dar Credit & Capital Ltd.
NBFC
match 156
51
6.5
11.4%
+78%
FAIR VALUE
CPCAP
Small
CP Capital Limited
NBFC
match 156
61
5.2
7.6%
+81%
UNDERVALUED
BAIDFIN
Small
Baid Finserv Limited
NBFC
match 154
41
9.8
7.3%
+64%
WATCHLIST
AVAILFC
Small
Available Finance Limited
NBFC
match 153
51
1.0
8.6%
+91%
FAIR VALUE
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.