Skip to content

Equippp Social Impact Technologies Limited (EQUIPPP)

Small Cap

IT stocks · Small cap · NSE

Equippp Social Impact Technologies Limited operates in Government Solutions, within the IT sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹19.9
-0.87 · -4.19%
Market cap ₹225 Cr
ThemesAI / IT
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result12 Aug, 08:27 pm IST
Score22 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · IT P/E 21.4 (n=204)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

66Bullish

SMA20 -6.8% / mo · MACD − · sector +17.9pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 43
Sector RS: 100
Sector 3M: +12.7% vs Nifty 500 -5.2%

Latest FPI flow is positive, but a second consecutive positive fortnight is still required. View sector evidence

Technical chart

EQUIPPPD candles · FIT view+17.1%
Latest close ₹19.90 on 2026-10-21
Bar
-4.2%
RSI
36
MACD hist
-0.19
52W pos
50%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹20.77H ₹20.77L ₹19.74C ₹19.90Vol 2,765 sh
₹13.25₹16.56₹19.87₹23.18₹26.4952H52L₹19.902026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

EQUIPPPNifty ITNifty 500
-22%-10%+3%+15%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026EQUIPPP -18.8%Nifty IT +12.0%Nifty 500 -6.5%
EQUIPPP
-18.8%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty IT
+12.0%
Vs Nifty 500
-12.3 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-23.1%
₹25.9
52W range position
50%
₹13.9 - ₹25.9
ATR (14)
5.9%
₹1.2
Volume vs 20D
0.43x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹19.3 - ₹24
45.2% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, while price trend supports entry. This looks more like momentum/speculation than a clean fundamental investment setup.

Weak U-Score but strong trend: momentum may be ahead of fundamentals.

Suggested next step
Momentum only
Trend is strong but fundamentals do not support a clean investment thesis.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
22

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Average
42

Revenue +33.8% · PAT +15.4% YoY

Technical
Bullish
66

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-6909.6%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
64

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Average · 42/100

margin compression · Rev +34% YoY · PAT +15% YoY

Filed 12 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹12.7 Cr+33.8%+2.8%
EBITDA₹0.6 Cr+40.0%-62.4%
Operating margin4.4%+19 bps-765 bps
PAT₹0.3 Cr+15.4%-69.1%
PAT margin2.4%-37 bps-548 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
122.00
P/B
23.96
EV/EBITDA
58.02
Market Cap
225.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
20.10%
ROCE
10.70%
ROA
5.61%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-29.00%
EPS 5Y
-29.00%
Revenue 3Y
-58.00%
EPS 3Y
89.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
1.19
Interest Coverage
25.23×
Altman Z
7.57
Book Value
0.91

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
0/5
OCF
1.95 Cr
EPS TTM
0.17

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
87.35%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
66%

Financial History

Updated 22/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 12.7+2.8% vs prev
012.7Sep 2023: 0.0Dec 2023: 0.3Mar 2024: 1.6Jun 2024: 0.5Sep 2024: 0.5Dec 2024: 0.5Mar 2025: 5.7Jun 2025: 9.5Sep 2025: 10.9Dec 2025: 12.1Mar 2026: 12.4Jun 2026: 12.7Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 0.3-69.1% vs prev
-0.501.6Sep 2023: -0.4Dec 2023: -0.1Mar 2024: 0.7Jun 2024: -0.2Sep 2024: -0.5Dec 2024: -0.3Mar 2025: 1.6Jun 2025: 0.3Sep 2025: 0.2Dec 2025: 0.4Mar 2026: 1.0Jun 2026: 0.3Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 36.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 falling (~7.3% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 36 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 23% off 52W high · 44% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

73
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-15.4%
3M return
-18.8%
6M return
+22.2%
1Y return
+6.3%
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
+1
Sector rank
#7
Industry rank
#37
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 0.5% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +3.2% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price above
Sector
improving
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 98.34-3.30%
667993106119Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2698
RS vs Nifty 50098

Valuation & peers

U-Score 22 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

22U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth1/25
Quality12/20
Balance Sheet8/15
Cash Flow1/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
22

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

22/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Quality contributes 12/20 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 8/15 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 1/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -6909.6%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks

For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.

Blended relative
Primary lens
PE, EV/EBITDA, margin of safety, and FCF yield together.
Secondary checks
ROE/ROCE, growth, cash conversion, leverage, promoter risk.
Main risk check
One cheap metric is not enough if quality or cash flow is weak.
PE
122.0
PB
24.0
EV/EBITDA
58.0
ROE
20.1%
ROCE
10.7%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
1.2
MoS
-6909.6%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 22 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
22
Previous: 22
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-6909.6%
Previous: -6909.6%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

22 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹1.87
-966.6% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
1.7
Growth-justified Value
₹0.28
-6909.6% MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in IT — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
GOLDTECH
Small
AION-TECH SOLUTIONS LIMITED
IT Services / Digital
match 139
29
33.0
0.9%
-169%
OVERVALUED
FCSSOFT
Small
FCS Software Solutions Limited
IT Services / Digital
match 138
36
60.2
0.8%
-327%
WATCHLIST
COMFINTE
Small
Comfort Intech Limited
IT Services / Digital
match 138
14
128.0
1.3%
-6426%
OVERVALUED
INTENTECH
Small
Intense Technologies Limited
IT Services / Digital
match 138
31
12.2
11.5%
-108%
OVERVALUED
MHLXMIRU
Small
Mahalaxmi Rubtech Limited
IT Services / Digital
match 138
32
20.9
8.5%
+39%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Equippp Social Impact Technologies Limited operates in Government Solutions, within the IT sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
64Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 42nd percentile of the scored universe and 37th percentile within IT. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 43/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
7 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
42nd percentile

overall median 67 · IT: 37th pctile, median 69 · Small: 47th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

7 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
43
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
69
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
76
strong · capital discipline
Results
50
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 87.4%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸Only 0 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 1.19.
  • ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 109.4%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

5 shown
Annual report

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 9 Sep - Equippp Social Impact Technologies Limited has informed about a copy of news paper publication post dispatch of 34th AGM notice and integrated annual report for …

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 14 Aug - Equippp Social Impact Technologies Ltd has informed about copy of news paper publication

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual report

Notice Of 34Th Annual General Meeting And Annual Report For FY 2025-26 8 Sep

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.