Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Credit Rating 6 Oct - CRISIL assigns Century Plyboards ESG rating 62, up from 51, moving it to Strong.
Source: Bse
Materials stocks · Micro cap · NSE
Century Plyboards (India) Limited manufactures and sells plywood, laminates, MDF, and particle board products. It operates across various segments of the wood panel industry, serving both residential and commercial applications in India.
full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -8.4% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector -3.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue +33.5% · PAT +56.6% YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Rev +34% YoY · PAT +57% YoY · margin expansion · operating leverage
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹1,561 Cr | +33.5% | +4.6% |
| EBITDA | ₹198 Cr | +54.7% | +11.9% |
| Operating margin | 13.0% | +200 bps | +100 bps |
| PAT | ₹83 Cr | +56.6% | +5.1% |
| PAT margin | 5.3% | +79 bps | +3 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 20/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 36. Wait for confirmation.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 29 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Materials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
CENTURYPLY reported highest-ever quarterly revenue of Rs. 1,492 Cr in Q4 FY26, up 24.5% YoY and 10.5% QoQ. FY26 topline grew 19.2%, with PAT up 44.2% to Rs. 268 Cr. EBITDA margin (ex-forex) improved to 13.7% in Q4 and 13.0% for FY26.
The company delivered robust Q4 and FY26 results, driven by strong revenue growth across all key segments and significant margin expansion. Plywood, Laminates, and MDF showed healthy performance, while Particle Board benefited from new capacity and utilization.
Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 6 reported categories.
Plywood segment demonstrated sustainable growth on both QoQ and YoY basis, with healthy EBITDA expansion. Total income grew 15.6% in FY26.
Laminates segment delivered a stellar turnaround with strong revenue growth (13.9% in FY26) and margin improvement after two stagnant years.
MDF segment continued strong momentum, driven by improving capacity utilization and consistent QoQ growth. Total income grew 25.6% in FY26.
Particle Board segment witnessed robust growth (38.2% in FY26) driven by new capacity additions and improved capacity utilization.
Total capex incurred till FY26 is Rs 730 Cr against a budgeted cost of Rs 600 Cr. FY26 capex was Rs 50.5 Cr.
Total capex incurred till FY26 is Rs 210 Cr against a budgeted cost of Rs 200 Cr. FY26 capex was Rs 12.3 Cr.
Total capex incurred till FY26 is Rs 693.6 Cr against a budgeted cost of Rs 550 Cr. FY26 capex was Rs 354.4 Cr.
Total capex incurred till FY26 is Rs 96.2 Cr against a budgeted cost of Rs 30 Cr. FY26 capex was Rs 7.9 Cr.
MDF segment's strong momentum driven by improving capacity utilization. Particle Board segment's robust growth driven by improved capacity utilization.
Particle Board segment witnessed robust growth driven by new capacity additions.
Forex losses impacted overall EBITDA and PBT. Total forex loss in FY26 was Rs 57.28 Cr.
Exceptional items in FY26 pertain to gratuity impact of labour law, and Q3 FY26 included Rs 7.61 Cr for increased gratuity liability.
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
QoQ comparison is relevant for assessing sequential momentum and utilization ramp-up in segments like MDF and Particle Board. YoY comparison provides a broader view of overall business health and growth trends.
Q4 FY26 Total Income: Rs 1,492.21 Cr (+24.5% YoY, +10.5% QoQ). FY26 Total Income: Rs 5,397.18 Cr (+19.2% YoY).
Q4 FY26 EBITDA margin: 13.7% (vs 12.6% QoQ, 12.1% YoY). FY26 EBITDA margin: 13.0% (vs 11.1% FY25).
FY26 PAT: Rs 268.33 Cr (+44.2% YoY). Q4 FY26 PAT: Rs 79.41 Cr (+49.4% YoY, +22.1% QoQ).
FY26 Total Debt / EBITDA: 2.47 (vs 2.97 in FY25).
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| EBITDA Margin (ex-forex) | FY26: 13.0%, Q4 FY26: 13.7% | Sustained margin improvement across segments, especially Laminates and Particle Board, and overall consolidated margin expansion. |
| Capacity Utilization | MDF and Particle Board segments showing improving utilization. | Continued ramp-up in utilization rates for new and expanded capacities, particularly in MDF and Particle Board, to drive profitability. |
| Debt/EBITDA Ratio | FY26: 2.47 | Further reduction in the debt-to-EBITDA ratio as new capacities stabilize and generate higher cash flows, given ongoing capex. |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | FY26: 81.19 days | Efficient working capital management to maintain or further reduce the cash conversion cycle, supporting liquidity amidst growth. |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 81st percentile of the scored universe and 84th percentile within Materials. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 48/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Materials: 84th pctile, median 70 · Micro: 66th pctile, median 73
137 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse