IP
IndiaPulse

Carborundum Universal Limited (CARBORUNIV)

Large Cap

Industrials stocks · Large cap · NSE

Carborundum Universal Limited (CUMI) is an Indian manufacturer of abrasives, ceramics, and electrominerals. The company has a global presence and is focusing on advanced materials for emerging sectors like semiconductors, aerospace & defense, and clean energy, while also optimizing its core businesses.

₹1,130.6
+52.60 · +4.88%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Industrials P/E 26.4 (n=540)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, while price trend supports entry. This looks more like momentum/speculation than a clean fundamental investment setup.

Suggested next step
Momentum only
Trend is strong but fundamentals do not support a clean investment thesis.
Weak U-Score but strong trend: momentum may be ahead of fundamentals.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
22

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
69

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Bullish
65

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
mixed
53

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Good · 57/100

Rev +17% YoY · PAT +33% YoY · operating leverage · margin compression

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹1,427 Cr+17.1%+2.1%
EBITDA₹135 Cr+11.6%-6.3%
Operating margin9.0%-100 bps-100 bps
PAT₹80 Cr+33.3%NDF
PAT margin5.6%+69 bps+847 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-03T16:54:17.902Z
Management commentary snapshot

CUMI reports strong H2 and Q4 FY26 rebound in standalone sales and PAT, driven by Electrominerals and Ceramics. Consolidated PBT declined due to losses from divested subsidiaries, but management expects significant margin improvement post-restructuring.

The company's decisive actions to wind down loss-making foreign subsidiaries (Awuko, Foskor Zirconia) are positive for future profitability. Strong standalone performance and a broad-based H2 FY26 recovery across segments, coupled with strategic investments in high-growth advanced materials, support the long-term thesis, despite short-term consolidated PBT decline.

Current business mix

Electrominerals Revenue by Product Category (Current)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 3 reported categories.

Businessmix
Core Fused Alumina & Silicon Carbide85.0%
Treated Products (Heat Treatment & Coating)5.5%
Specialty Products (Alumina Zirconia, Zircon Mullite)8.0%
Growth engines

Semiconductor Wafer Fab Equipment Components

Commissioned an exclusive facility for advanced components for semiconductor wafer fabrication equipment. Serial supplies of qualified products will commence in FY27, with gradual ramp-up.

Aerospace & Defense Ceramics

Commissioned a new facility for advanced Ceramics for ballistic protection. Secured STANAG 4 qualification for vehicle armor and BIS Threat Level 5 & 6 for personnel protection.

SOFC Segment (Engineering Ceramics)

Engineering Ceramics segment grew by 30%, driven by the SOFC segment, which is seeing strong demand in the AI-driven data center segment. Management expects substantial growth.

Exports in Electrominerals

Exports grew by 100% from FY25 to FY26, now contributing over 33% of total sales (vs. 11% in FY25), driven by existing OEM relationships and anti-dumping duties against Chinese grains.

Capacity and execution

Semiconductor Wafer Fab Equipment Components Facility

Commissioned first module with INR 66 crores CAPEX. End-to-end capability from high purity powders to precision machining. Serial supplies in FY27, gradual utilization ramp-up. Further expansions planned.

Aerospace & Defense Ceramics Facility

Commissioned new facility with INR 49 crores outlay for advanced Ceramics for ballistic protection. Business expected to scale up high by 2030.

White Fused Alumina (WFA) Furnace Upgrade

Upgradation of existing WFA furnace from 2 MVA to 4.5 MVA with INR 53 crores CAPEX. Will substantially increase existing capacities, with maximum revenue potential of INR 95 crores.

Thin Wheel Capacity (Hosur)

Commissioning of thin wheel capacity at Hosur using DRONCO assets. Total CAPEX outlay INR 83 crores, can produce 46 million thin wheels with peak revenue of INR 120 crores.

Tailwinds

Rebound in Festival Season Demand

Rebound in festival season demand provided a growth impetus, particularly for Abrasives in H2 FY26.

GST Rate Rationalization

Implementation of GST rate rationalization provided a growth impetus for Abrasives.

Anti-Dumping Duties on Chinese Grains

Anti-dumping duties against Chinese grains by EU helped drive stronger growth in Electrominerals exports.

China's Export Rebate Removal on Abrasives

China removed export rebate on Abrasive products (9% to 0%) from April. Management believes this is good for the domestic industry and will help growth.

Headwinds

Sanctions on VAW Russia

Lower sales and profits at VAW Russia due to USA sanctions. Sales declined 35.3% in rouble terms in FY26. No alternate solution for export beyond Russia currently.

Logistics Transition Impact (Rhodius)

Rhodius Abrasives sales declined 8.8% in FY26 (EUR 61M vs EUR 67M) due to a EUR 5 million sales loss from a Q1 FY26 transition to a new third-party logistics partner.

Underperformance of Subsidiaries

Continued underperformance and mounting losses at Awuko Abrasives and Foskor Zirconia led to their winding down, impacting consolidated PBT significantly.

Production Challenge in Metallized Cylinder Business

Metallized Cylinder business growth was impacted by a production-related challenge in H1 FY26, which was addressed by Q4.

Risk radar

Geopolitical Sanctions

Ongoing sanctions on VAW Russia continue to restrict its operations and export capabilities, with no immediate alternative solution identified.

Global Competition & Input Costs

Escalation in electricity and other input costs, coupled with intensifying global competition and foreign exchange fluctuations, rendered Foskor Zirconia unviable.

New Product Qualification Timelines

Material qualification process for Ceramic components for wafer fab equipment is long (4-6 years). Material revenue generation expected only from 2029 onwards.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

The company experienced a muted H1 FY26, followed by a strong rebound in H2 and Q4. Comparing both YoY and QoQ provides a comprehensive view of the full-year performance and the recent sequential momentum, which is crucial for assessing the recovery and future trajectory.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Standalone Sales Growth (FY26 YoY)

Standalone sales in FY26 was INR 3,024 crores compared to INR 2,784 crores in FY25, a growth of 8.6%. The company crossed INR 3,000 crores in standalone revenue.

Consolidated Sales Growth (FY26 YoY)

Consolidated sales was INR 5,149 crores in FY26, a growth of 6.5% over INR 4,833 crores in FY25. The company surpassed INR 5,000 crores in consolidated revenue.

Standalone PAT Growth (FY26 YoY)

Standalone PAT was INR 416 crores in FY26, compared to INR 322 crores in FY25, reflecting a growth of 29.4% YoY. Q4 FY26 PAT doubled to INR 122 crores from INR 61 crores in Q4 FY25.

Consolidated PBT (before exceptional items) Growth (FY26 YoY)

Consolidated PBT before exceptional items and taxes stood at INR 416 crores compared to INR 572 crores in FY25, reflecting a drop of 27.2% YoY, mainly due to VAW, Foskor, Awuko, and Rhodius.

Management forward view

Aspiration 2030 Strategy

Launched Aspiration 2030 focusing on high-performance organization, ambitious growth, innovation, new opportunities, manufacturing excellence, sales & marketing, and digital/ESG initiatives.

R&D Investment Increase

Current R&D spend of ~1% needs to increase to 2-3% to strengthen R&D teams, new product development processes, and accelerate CAPEX/OPEX spend.

Focus on Transformational Products

Investing in SOFC powders, Nitrides, HPSiC, and Graphene, expecting them to contribute ~10% of revenue by 2030 from current negligible levels, creating a new leg of growth.

FY27 Consolidated Sales & Margin Guidance (Ex-Divestments)

Comparable consolidated sales growth of 11-12% (excluding Awuko & Foskor). Abrasives margin 9.5-10% (vs. 7.9% ex-Awuko FY26). Electrominerals margin 9-9.5% (vs. 9.1% ex-Foskor FY26).

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Consolidated Sales Growth (Ex-Divestments)FY27 guidance: 11-12%Achievement of targeted growth, indicating successful integration of divested entities' impact and core business expansion.
Consolidated Abrasives PBIT Margin (Ex-Awuko)FY27 guidance: 9.5-10% (vs. 7.9% in FY26)Improvement in profitability as loss-making Awuko is wound down and cost optimization programs take effect.
Consolidated Electrominerals PBIT Margin (Ex-Foskor)FY27 guidance: 9-9.5% (vs. 9.1% in FY26)Stability or slight improvement in margins after the closure of Foskor Zirconia, despite ongoing VAW challenges.
FY27 CAPEXINR 400 crores plannedExecution of planned CAPEX for Advanced Ceramics, BFA expansion, thermal spray powders, and Zirconia furnace, indicating progress on growth engines.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

65Bullish

full bull SMA stack · SMA20 +4.7% / mo · MACD −

Stock trend: 77
Sector RS: 48
Sector 3M: -1.6% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

CARBORUNIVdaily · 1Y · AUTO+39.0%
Latest close ₹1130.60 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+4.8%
RSI
54
MACD hist
-3.59
52W pos
69%
2026-09-04O ₹1078.70H ₹1140.90L ₹1069.90C ₹1130.60Vol 3.4L sh
₹706.62₹863.83₹1.02k₹1.18k₹1.34k52H52L1130.602026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bullish setup

Trend is constructive — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 54.

  • Price > SMA20 > SMA50 > SMA200 — full bullish stack.
  • SMA20 rising (~4.5% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 54 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 13% off 52W high · 54% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

78
RS percentile
Stage 2 Uptrend
1M return
+3.1%
3M return
+8.7%
6M return
+43.6%
1Y return
+12.9%
RS 1D
+6
RS 20D
-2
Sector rank
#2
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is 14.3% above the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is above the 30-week proxy and its slope is rising +4.5%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are positive.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price above
Sector
leading
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 129.48+4.88%
85100115130145Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 26129
RS vs Nifty 500129

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 22 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

22U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth5/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet8/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
22

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

22/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Balance sheet contributes 8/15 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -1652.6%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks

For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.

Blended relative
Primary lens
PE, EV/EBITDA, margin of safety, and FCF yield together.
Secondary checks
ROE/ROCE, growth, cash conversion, leverage, promoter risk.
Main risk check
One cheap metric is not enough if quality or cash flow is weak.
PE
85.9
PB
5.5
EV/EBITDA
25.9
ROE
6.9%
ROCE
10.5%
FCF Yield
0.9%
Debt/Equity
0.1
MoS
-1652.6%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
22
Previous: 22
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-1652.6%
Previous: -1652.6%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹225.15
-402.2% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
5.9
Growth-justified Value
₹64.51
-1652.6% MoS
PEG

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
69Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 59th percentile of the scored universe and 56th percentile within Industrials. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 42/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: 2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
53 docs text-extracted · 42 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
59th percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 56th pctile, median 68 · Large: 35th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

53 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
89
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
42
weak · capital discipline
Results
53
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 0.9%.
  • 10 years of positive FCF.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • 2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ROE is low at 6.9%.
  • ROCE trend is -5.2%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
85.90
P/B
5.52
EV/EBITDA
25.95
Market Cap
21539.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
6.92%
ROCE
10.50%
ROA
3.57%
Dividend Y
0.35%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
15.00%
EPS 5Y
-3.00%
Revenue 3Y
4.00%
EPS 3Y
-14.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.11
Interest Coverage
28.24×
Altman Z
8.70
Book Value
205.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.93%
FCF Positive Y
10/5
OCF
367.00 Cr
EPS TTM
10.99

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
38.90%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
69%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 3,063+8.3% vs prev
03063Mar 2017: 1,406Mar 2018: 1,583Mar 2019: 1,782Mar 2020: 1,651Mar 2021: 1,672Mar 2022: 2,215Mar 2023: 2,510Mar 2024: 2,633Mar 2025: 2,828Mar 2026: 3,063FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 416+29.2% vs prev
0416.0Mar 2017: 122Mar 2018: 143Mar 2019: 166Mar 2020: 191Mar 2021: 184Mar 2022: 254Mar 2023: 331Mar 2024: 350Mar 2025: 322Mar 2026: 416FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 2,189+19678.4% vs prev
02189Mar 2017: 11.6%Mar 2018: 12.2%Mar 2019: 13.0%Mar 2020: 14.0%Mar 2021: 12.0%Mar 2022: 14.6%Mar 2023: 14.4%Mar 2024: 13.7%Mar 2025: 11.1%Mar 2026: 2,189%FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Peers

Business-comparable names in Industrials, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.