IP
IndiaPulse

Can Fin Homes Limited (CANFINHOME)

Large Cap

Financial Services stocks · Large cap · NSE

Can Fin Homes Limited is a 38-year-old deposit-taking HFC, promoted by Canara Bank (approx. 30% shareholding). Headquartered in Bengaluru, it has a pan-India presence with 249 branches across 21 States/UTs, focusing on housing loans to individuals with prudent underwriting and ethical practices.

₹807.4
+2.45 · +0.30%
Quote04 Sept, 03:55 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags03 May 2026
Coverage12/14 · 86%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Financial Services P/E 18.5 (n=240)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Mixed fundamentals, management trust needs verification, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
FAIR VALUE
51

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
58

low confidence · 2/4 claims checked

Technical
Bearish
27

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
consistent
87

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Average · 45/100

Rev +7% YoY · PAT +20% YoY · operating leverage

Filed 18 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹1,096 Cr+7.5%+2.0%
EBITDANDFNDFNDF
Operating marginNDFNDFNDF
PAT₹268 Cr+19.6%-22.5%
PAT margin24.4%+249 bps-777 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-03T16:53:15.544Z
Management commentary snapshot

Q4 FY26 PAT surged 48% YoY to `346 Cr, with Loan Book growing 10% YoY to `42209 Cr. NIM improved to 4.19% (QoQ) and GNPA decreased to 0.85% (QoQ). Strong operational performance, though Cost to Income Ratio increased sequentially.

Can Fin Homes delivered robust Q4 FY26 results, marked by strong PAT growth, healthy AUM expansion, and improved asset quality. The company's focus on digital transformation and diversified sourcing channels supports future growth, despite a sequential uptick in the cost-to-income ratio.

Current business mix

Loan Book by Borrower Category (Mar'26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.

Businessmix
Salaried & Professionals68.0%
Non-Salaried Class - Self-Employed & Non-Professionals32.0%
Growth engines

Expansion of Sourcing Channels

Company aims to expand sourcing channels to attract different segments of borrowers, facilitating upward trajectory.

Thrust on Direct Sourcing

Company intends to enhance its loan portfolio through a thrust on direct sourcing.

Digitalization and Technology Integration

Company intends to evolve with technology, integrating new processes for better, improved customer service and building robust digital capabilities.

Increased Lending to New Home Aspirants

Vision includes increasing lending to new home aspirants and enhancing value for stakeholders.

Tailwinds

Consistent Management Support

Company benefits from consistent management support and guidance from its sponsor, Canara Bank.

Stable Liquidity Position

The company maintains a consistent and stable liquidity position.

Strong Credit Ratings

Long-term loans and NCDs are rated AAA/Stable by CARE, ICRA, and IND Ra, and Public Deposits are AAA/Stable.

Risk radar

Cost to Income Ratio Trend

The Cost to Income Ratio increased to 19.84% in Q4 FY26 from 18.53% QoQ and 19.36% YoY, indicating potential pressure on operational efficiency.

Geographical Concentration

South India still accounts for 60% of incremental disbursements as of Mar'26, posing concentration risk despite a projected slight reduction by Mar'28.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison provides a clear view of overall growth and profitability trends, which is crucial for a housing finance company. QoQ comparison highlights immediate operational momentum, asset quality changes, and margin dynamics.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

AUM Growth

Outstanding Loan Book reached `42209 Cr (+10% YoY) as on Mar'26.

Disbursements

Disbursements were `3246 Cr in Q4 FY26, up 32% YoY from `2455 Cr and 19% QoQ from `2727 Cr.

Net Interest Margin (NIM)

NIM was 4.19% in Q4 FY26, up from 3.82% YoY and 4.14% QoQ.

Cost of Borrowing

Cost of Borrowing was 7.07% in Q4 FY26, down from 7.56% YoY and 7.14% QoQ.

Management forward view

Sustained Focus Areas

Management will continue its thrust on growth, asset quality, profitability, and liquidity, with unwavering focus on good governance and due diligence.

Technological Evolution

Company intends to evolve further with technology, keeping abreast with digitalization changes for improved customer service.

Sourcing Channel Diversification

Management aims to expand sourcing channels to attract different segments of borrowers, facilitating the company’s upward trajectory.

Roadmap 2028 Targets

Company has a roadmap to Mar-28 with projected changes in geographical concentration, product mix, segment mix, and sourcing mix.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
AUM Growth10% YoY in FY26Sustained double-digit AUM growth, indicating continued market penetration and demand.
Net Interest Margin (NIM)4.19% in Q4 FY26Stability or further expansion of NIM, supported by favorable borrowing costs and yield management.
Asset Quality (GNPA/NNPA)GNPA 0.85%, NNPA 0.37% in Q4 FY26Continued low delinquency rates and effective management of non-performing assets as the loan book grows.
Cost to Income Ratio19.84% in Q4 FY26Efficiency improvements to manage or reduce the cost-to-income ratio, especially with ongoing digital investments.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Show extracted source claims
revenue outlooknot yet verifiablequantified

By March 2028, the company projects its incremental disbursement to have a geographical concentration of 60% in South and 40% in North.

Timeframe: Mar-28Direction: DistributionConfidence: Projected

"Mar-28 South 60% North 40% (Proj.)"

revenue outlookdeliveredquantified

By March 2028, the company projects its incremental disbursement to have a geographical concentration of 60% in South and 40% in North.

Timeframe: Mar-28Direction: DistributionConfidence: Projected

"Mar-28 South 60% North 40% (Proj.)"

Outcome check: Revenue YoY averaged 8.2% across 2 later quarter(s).

revenue outlookdeliveredquantified

By March 2028, the company projects its AUM product mix to be 80% Housing Loans and 20% Non-Housing Loans.

Timeframe: Mar-28Direction: DistributionConfidence: Projected

"Mar-28 HL 80% NHL 20% (Proj.)"

Outcome check: Revenue YoY averaged 8.2% across 2 later quarter(s).

revenue outlooknot yet verifiablequantified

By March 2028, the company projects its AUM product mix to be 80% Housing Loans and 20% Non-Housing Loans.

Timeframe: Mar-28Direction: DistributionConfidence: Projected

"Mar-28 HL 80% NHL 20% (Proj.)"

project executionnot yet verifiable

The IT Transformation project is expected to be implemented from Q3FY26.

Timeframe: Q3FY26Direction: ImplementationConfidence: Expected

"Expected implementation from Q3FY26"

project executionnot yet verifiable

The IT Transformation project is expected to be implemented from Q3FY26.

Timeframe: Q3FY26Direction: ImplementationConfidence: Expected

"Expected implementation from Q3FY26"

project executionnot yet verifiable

Several IT systems, including HRMS, Aadhar Data Vault, DMS, LOS, LMS, Finance & Accounting (Sprint-2), Deposits, and Reports, are planned to Go-Live in Q3 FY26.

Timeframe: Q3 FY26Direction: Go-LiveConfidence: Planned Go-Live

"Planned Go-Live (Q3 FY26)"

project executionnot yet verifiable

Several IT systems, including HRMS, Aadhar Data Vault, DMS, LOS, LMS, Finance & Accounting (Sprint-2), Deposits, and Reports, are planned to Go-Live in Q3 FY26.

Timeframe: Q3 FY26Direction: Go-LiveConfidence: Planned Go-Live

"Planned Go-Live (Q3 FY26)"

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

27Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -3.2% / mo · MACD +

Stock trend: 27
Sector RS:

Technical chart

CANFINHOMEdaily · 1Y · AUTO-2.3%
Latest close ₹807.40 on 2026-09-04
Bar
-0.1%
RSI
45
MACD hist
0.40
52W pos
31%
2026-09-04O ₹808.00H ₹815.00L ₹802.60C ₹807.40Vol 2.2L sh
₹763.40₹810.68₹857.95₹905.22₹952.50807.402026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 45.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~3.3% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 45 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 17% off 52W high · 10% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

48
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-0.5%
3M return
-2.4%
6M return
-7.5%
1Y return
+3.9%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
+2
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
#16
Stage evidence
  • Price is 5.1% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -1.5%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
neutral
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 105.47+0.30%
95102110117124Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 26105
RS vs Nifty 500105

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 51 · FAIR VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

51U-SCORE
Deep Value

Fundamental score breakdown

FAIR VALUE
Valuation22/30
Growth17/25
Quality10/20
Balance Sheet0/15
Cash Flow1/10
Piotroski
3/9 (+1)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
51

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

51/100 · FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 65.7%.
  • Valuation contributes 22/30 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 17/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 0.4, in distress territory.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 0/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 1/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

NBFC valuation: P/B, ROA, borrowing cost, and asset quality

Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.

NBFC P/B
Primary lens
P/B adjusted for ROA/ROE and leverage quality.
Secondary checks
AUM growth, spreads, credit cost, liquidity and ALM risk.
Main risk check
Fast growth with weak asset quality deserves a discount.
PE
9.5
PB
1.8
EV/EBITDA
3063.1
ROE
19.7%
ROCE
9.1%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
6.4
MoS
+65.7%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
51
Previous: 50 (+1)
Verdict
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+65.7%
Previous: +65.7%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
51
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
48
50
50
50

Factor attribution

Growth
17+1
was 16

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹925.79
+12.8% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
27.8
Growth-justified Value
₹2,354.31
+65.7% MoS
PEG
0.49

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
58Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Management has 100% delivered/partly-delivered outcomes on 2 checked claims. It ranks around the 23rd percentile of the scored universe and 39th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 22/100.

Mixed Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-2910 Cr.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
130 docs text-extracted · 32 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
23rd percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 39th pctile, median 62 · Large: 13th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

130 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
100% delivered or partly delivered

2/4 claims checked · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
40
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
22
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
76
strong · capital discipline
Results
87
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
  • Latest 3 quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust risks

  • Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-2910 Cr.
  • Debt/equity is 6.40.
  • Altman Z is 0.41.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
9.52
P/B
1.80
EV/EBITDA
3063.06
Market Cap
10751.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
19.70%
ROCE
9.14%
ROA
2.55%
Dividend Y
1.86%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
16.00%
EPS 5Y
19.00%
Revenue 3Y
15.00%
EPS 3Y
20.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
6.40
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
0.40
Book Value
449.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
2/5
OCF
-2910.00 Cr
EPS TTM
84.84

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
29.99%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
31%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Financial Services, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.