Skip to content

Grill Splendour Services Ltd. (BIRDYS)

SME Cap

Services stocks · SME cap · NSE

Grill Splendour Services Ltd. operates in Food Services, within the Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹74.35
+0.00 · +0.00%
Market cap ₹52.8 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals16 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result01 Jun, 07:52 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage11/14 · 79%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Services P/E 17.7 (n=143)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

39Bearish

SMA20 -30.8% / mo · RSI oversold · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 39
Sector RS: —

FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but exact sector-index confirmation is unavailable. View sector evidence

Technical chart

BIRDYSD candles · FIT view-42.5%
Latest close ₹74.35 on 2026-10-14
Bar
+0.0%
RSI
28
MACD hist
-0.49
52W pos
2%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-14O ₹74.35H ₹74.35L ₹74.35C ₹74.35Vol 1,200 sh
₹69.68₹88.78₹107.88₹126.97₹146.0752L₹74.35VolRSIMACD2026-042026-052026-072026-102026-10
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

BIRDYSNifty 500
-25%-15%-6%+4%14 Jul8 Sept14 Oct14 Oct 2026BIRDYS -21.0%Nifty 500 -5.0%
BIRDYS
-21.0%
Nifty 500
-5.0%
Vs Nifty 500
-16.0 pp
Chart stats
14 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-51.7%
₹154
52W range position
1%
₹73.2 - ₹154
ATR (14)
5.1%
₹3.8
Volume vs 20D
0.02x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.5 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹73.2 - ₹100.8
54.4% annualized volatility

No exact NSE sector index is mapped for this company. Nifty 500 remains the broad-market comparison.

Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Verify management risk first
Do not let cheap valuation override weak Trust or governance evidence.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
1

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -28.6% · PAT NDF YoY

Technical
Bearish
39

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
—

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
46

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -29% YoY · margin expansion

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹5 Cr-28.6%+0.0%
EBITDA₹-3 CrNDF+25.0%
Operating margin-50.0%NDF+2500 bps
PAT₹-7 CrNDFNDF
PAT margin-140.0%NDF-8000 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
—
P/B
2.42
EV/EBITDA
—
Market Cap
52.80Cr

Profitability

ROE
-27.40%
ROCE
-28.50%
ROA
-44.00%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
4.00%
EPS 5Y
—
Revenue 3Y
-13.00%
EPS 3Y
-29.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.16
Interest Coverage
—
Altman Z
5.89
Book Value
30.80

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
0/5
OCF
-7.00 Cr
EPS TTM
-16.98

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
26.87%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
2%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 5.0+0.0% vs prev
010.0Mar 2023: 10.0Sep 2023: 7.0Mar 2024: 7.0Sep 2024: 4.0Mar 2025: 6.0Sep 2025: 5.0Mar 2026: 5.0FY23Q2 23FY24Q2 24FY25Q2 25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: -7.0-133.3% vs prev
-7.002.0Mar 2023: 2.0Sep 2023: 1.0Mar 2024: -1.0Sep 2024: -1.0Mar 2025: -3.0Sep 2025: -3.0Mar 2026: -7.0FY23Q2 23FY24Q2 24FY25Q2 25FY26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 28. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 falling (~44.6% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 28 — oversold zone; bounce conditions.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

7
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-29.9%
3M return
-38.2%
6M return
-39.3%
1Y return
-
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
-11
Sector rank
#12
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is 37.9% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -3.8%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
unavailable
Sector
neutral
Industry
unranked
Partial-history RS: the 3M and 6M weights are re-normalised because 12M history is unavailable.
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
107 observations
14 Oct 2026Value 63.86+0.65%
617692108123Sept 25Jan 26Jun 26Oct 2664
RS vs Nifty 50064

Valuation & peers

U-Score 1 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

1U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation2/30
Growth2/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet4/15
Cash Flow0/10
Piotroski
2/9 (+0)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
1

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

1/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Balance sheet contributes 4/15 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 2/25 to the score.
  • Valuation contributes 2/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 0/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks

For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.

Blended relative
Primary lens
PE, EV/EBITDA, margin of safety, and FCF yield together.
Secondary checks
ROE/ROCE, growth, cash conversion, leverage, promoter risk.
Main risk check
One cheap metric is not enough if quality or cash flow is weak.
PE
—
PB
2.4
EV/EBITDA
—
ROE
-27.4%
ROCE
-28.5%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.2
MoS
—
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
1
Previous: 1
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
—
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
—
Growth-justified P/E
1.7
Growth-justified Value
—
— MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
SAJHOTELS
SME
Saj Hotels Ltd.
Hospitality
match 112
54
15.8
2.4%
+51%
FAIR VALUE
KHFM
SME
KHFM Hospitality And Facility Management Services Ltd.
Hospitality
match 110
3
27.0
5.5%
-498%
OVERVALUED
BLUECOAST
Small
Blue Coast Hotels Limited
Hospitality
match 108
26
—
—
—
OVERVALUED
HAVISHA
Small
Sri Havisha Hospitality and Infrastructure Limited
Hospitality
match 105
15
—
-8.7%
—
OVERVALUED
TGBHOTELS
Small
TGB Banquets And Hotels Limited
Hospitality
match 104
43
20.9
2.2%
+41%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Grill Splendour Services Ltd. operates in Food Services, within the Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
46Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 3rd percentile of the scored universe and 2nd percentile within Services. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 28/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
3rd percentile

overall median 67 · Services: 2nd pctile, median 66 · SME: 3rd pctile, median 64

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
60
acceptable · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
28
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
81
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
30
weak · capital discipline
Results
31
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.

Trust risks

  • ▸Promoter holding fell 5.7%.
  • ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-7 Cr.
  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸Only 0 years of positive FCF.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

3 shown
Annual reportSep 2026

Sep 2026 · Shareholders meeting 5 Sep - 7th AGM on September 30, 2026; annual report and reappointment of Vivek Vijaykumar Sood.

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Annual Report 2026

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2025

Mar 2025 · Annual Report 2025

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.