IP
IndiaPulse

Bajaj Housing Finance Limited (BAJAJHFL)

Large Cap

Financial Services stocks · Large cap · NSE

Bajaj Housing Finance Limited (BHFL) is an Indian housing finance company offering a full suite of mortgage products including home loans, lease rental discounting (LRD), loans against property (LAP), and developer financing (DF). It aims to be a large mortgage player with a focus on scale, low risk, and reasonable returns.

₹83.08
+0.13 · +0.16%
Quote04 Sept, 03:58 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags03 May 2026
Coverage12/14 · 86%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Financial Services P/E 18.5 (n=240)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust needs verification, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
24

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Weak Trust
54

low confidence · 2/8 claims checked

Technical
Strong Bear
19

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
consistent
87

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Excellent · 75/100

Rev +17% YoY · PAT +23% YoY · +6% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 29 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹3,063 Cr+17.1%+5.5%
EBITDANDFNDFNDF
Operating marginNDFNDFNDF
PAT₹715 Cr+22.6%+6.9%
PAT margin23.3%+105 bps+29 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-03T16:26:23.696Z
Management commentary snapshot

BHFL reported strong AUM and NII growth of 23% and 25% YoY respectively for FY26, with improved operating efficiency (Opex to NTI at 19.7%) and better-than-target asset quality (GNPA 0.27%). However, credit costs rose significantly, and ROA/ROE saw slight moderation.

The company largely met or exceeded its FY26 financial targets, demonstrating robust AUM growth and operational efficiency. While asset quality remained strong, the notable increase in loan loss provisions warrants close monitoring for future periods, as ROA and ROE saw slight declines.

Current business mix

Portfolio Mix as of 31st Mar’26

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 5 reported categories.

Businessmix
Home Loans54.1%
Lease Rental Discounting (LRD)22.4%
Developer Financing (DF)11.5%
Loans Against Property (LAP)10.8%
Others1.2%
Growth engines

Home Loans Penetration

Aim to increase market share to 5% in incremental home loan originations from current ~2.5-2.7%.

Growing All Products

Focus on growing all products (HL, LRD, DF, LAP) across Prime and Sambhav customer segments.

Digitalization & Operating Efficiencies

Building operating efficiencies and digitalizing processes to reduce Opex to NTI to 14-15%.

Developer Financing Relationships

Leveraging developer financing funded relationships and 9,400+ APF network for customer access.

Tailwinds

Housing Finance Sector Growth

Home loans industry grew 13.4% CAGR (FY20-26E) and is expected to grow 14-16% CAGR till FY28.

Government Impetus

Housing finance sector remained resilient due to Government impetus of 'Housing for All'.

Demographic & Economic Factors

Rising per capita income and demand for larger homes post-Covid support sector growth.

Headwinds

Increased Loan Losses

Loan losses and provisions increased 112% YoY in Q4 FY26 and 229% YoY for FY26, indicating rising credit costs.

Competitive Prime Segment

Housing finance is a matured industry dominated by banks, making the prime segment highly competitive for a late entrant like BHFL.

Moderating HFC Share

HFCs' market share moderated from 21.3% (FY20) to 18.3% (FY25), indicating competitive pressure from banks.

Risk radar

Asset Quality Management

Maintaining low GNPA (target 40-60 bps) is a strategic pillar, but credit cost increased significantly in FY26.

ALM Mismatch

Mortgage is a long-term asset business requiring long-term liabilities to avoid ALM mismatch.

Execution Risk in New Segments

Investment phase in near prime (next 1 year) and affordable (next 2 years) segments carries inherent execution and credit risk.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Dec 2025
Analyst reading lens
Compare YOY

The document primarily presents annual financial results for FY26 compared to FY25, and also provides Q4 FY26 vs Q4 FY25, indicating that year-over-year comparison is most relevant for assessing overall annual performance and growth trends.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

AUM Growth

AUM grew 23% YoY to 140,706 Cr in FY26, meeting the 21-23% assessment.

Net Interest Income (NII)

NII increased 25% YoY to 3,752 Cr in FY26.

Operating Expenses to Net Total Income (Opex to NTI)

Opex to NTI improved to 19.7% in FY26, better than the 20-21% assessment.

Gross NPA (%)

Gross NPA stood at 0.27% in FY26, better than the 35-40 bps assessment and lowest among large players.

Management forward view

Market Share Ambition

Management aims to become a large mortgage player and increase market share to 5% in incremental home loan originations.

Optimized Product Mix

Will optimize product mix with 2-3% movement between products based on risk-adjusted returns.

Digital Transformation

Continue to digitalize processes for ease, enhanced controllership, and Opex to NTI reduction to 14-15%.

Treasury Optimization

Focus on balancing floating and fixed rate liabilities for optimized cost of fund to enable competitive lending.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Incremental Home Loan Market Share~2.5-2.7%Progress towards 5% market share in incremental home loan originations.
Opex to NTI19.7% (FY26)Further reduction towards the 14-15% target.
GNPA0.27% (FY26)Maintenance within the 40-60 bps target range.
Credit Cost0.17% (FY26)Stabilization or reduction, especially given the significant YoY increase.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Show extracted source claims
margin outlooknot yet verifiablequantified

The company expects to see an additional 10 basis points of benefit on its cost of funds during the balance part of the year.

Timeframe: H2 FY2026Direction: upConfidence: medium
margin outlooknot yet verifiablequantified

Full-year margins are expected to remain within the guided range of 15-20 bps compression due to portfolio attrition pressure.

Timeframe: Full Year FY2026Direction: downConfidence: high
operational efficiencynot yet verifiablequantified

The company expects to achieve an opex-to-NTI ratio of 14% to 15% over the next three to four years.

Timeframe: Next 3-4 yearsDirection: downConfidence: high
operational efficiencynot yet verifiablequantified

The company's business model is constructed to target 40 to 60 bps of GNPA and 20 to 25 bps of credit cost in the medium term.

Timeframe: Medium termDirection: stableConfidence: high
regulatory expectationnot yet verifiablequantified

The parent company has until September 2029 to dilute its shareholding to meet the 25% minimum public shareholding requirement.

Timeframe: By September 2029Direction: downConfidence: high
margin outlooknot yet verifiable

Gross spread is expected to normalize going forward, driven by portfolio rate pass-throughs and an expected rate cut in December.

Timeframe: H2 FY2026 / December 2025Direction: stableConfidence: medium
revenue outlookdelivered

The near prime and affordable housing business segment is expected to scale up and grow at a much faster pace next year.

Timeframe: FY2027Direction: upConfidence: high

Outcome check: Revenue YoY averaged 15.9% across 1 later quarter(s).

revenue outlookfailed

The company expects to return to its normalized medium-term AUM growth guidance by next year as attrition pressure stabilizes.

Timeframe: FY2027Direction: upConfidence: high

Outcome check: Revenue YoY averaged 15.9% across 1 later quarter(s).

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

19Strong Bear

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -2.4% / mo · MACD −

Stock trend: 19
Sector RS:

Technical chart

BAJAJHFLdaily · 1Y · AUTO-1.8%
Latest close ₹83.08 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+0.1%
RSI
39
MACD hist
-0.13
52W pos
24%
2026-09-04O ₹83.00H ₹83.55L ₹82.93C ₹83.08Vol 18.2L sh
₹71.58₹77.45₹83.33₹89.20₹95.0752L83.082026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 39.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~2.5% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 39 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 29% off 52W high · 14% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

19
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-3.2%
3M return
-1.1%
6M return
-0.7%
1Y return
-28.3%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
-1
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
#16
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 2.7% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed -1.0% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
neutral
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 71.73+0.15%
70788694102Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2672
RS vs Nifty 50072

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 24 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

24U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation2/30
Growth19/25
Quality2/20
Balance Sheet0/15
Cash Flow0/10
Piotroski
3/9 (+1)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
24

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

24/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Growth contributes 19/25 to the score.
  • Quality contributes 2/20 to the score.
  • Valuation contributes 2/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 0.6, in distress territory.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 0/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 0/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

NBFC valuation: P/B, ROA, borrowing cost, and asset quality

Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.

NBFC P/B
Primary lens
P/B adjusted for ROA/ROE and leverage quality.
Secondary checks
AUM growth, spreads, credit cost, liquidity and ALM risk.
Main risk check
Fast growth with weak asset quality deserves a discount.
PE
25.6
PB
3.1
EV/EBITDA
3529.2
ROE
12.1%
ROCE
8.8%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
4.6
MoS
+7.3%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
24
Previous: 24
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
+7.3%
Previous: +7.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
25
25
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹44.3
-87.6% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
27.8
Growth-justified Value
₹89.63
+7.3% MoS
PEG
0.72

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
54Weak Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Weak Trust: Management has 50% delivered/partly-delivered outcomes on 2 checked claims, with 1 adverse claim outcome. It ranks around the 13th percentile of the scored universe and 21st percentile within Financial Services. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 22/100.

Mixed Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 86.7%. Key concern: Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-19895 Cr.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
44 docs text-extracted · 12 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Weak Trust

Management or financial behaviour needs caution. Demand stronger valuation compensation.

Relative rank
13th percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 21st pctile, median 62 · Large: 7th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

44 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
50% delivered or partly delivered

2/8 claims checked · 1 contradicted/failed claim

How to read this Trust Score

Weak Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
28
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
22
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
68
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
87
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 86.7%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust risks

  • Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-19895 Cr.
  • Debt/equity is 4.60.
  • Altman Z is 0.62.
  • Promoter holding fell 2%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
25.60
P/B
3.08
EV/EBITDA
3529.16
Market Cap
69225.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
12.10%
ROCE
8.85%
ROA
2.12%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
29.00%
EPS 5Y
41.00%
Revenue 3Y
25.00%
EPS 3Y
27.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
4.60
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
0.62
Book Value
27.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
0/5
OCF
-19895.00 Cr
EPS TTM
3.23

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
86.70%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
24%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Financial Services, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.