Jul 2026 · PPT
Source: Bse
Pharma stocks · Large cap · NSE
Anthem Biosciences Limited is a contract research, development, and manufacturing organization (CRDMO) and producer of specialty ingredients, serving the life sciences sector.
SMA20 -6.9% / mo · MACD − · sector +4.9pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)
FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but the sector index is below its 100-session average. View sector evidence
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
Mixed fundamentals, while price trend supports entry. This looks more like momentum/speculation than a clean fundamental investment setup.
Weak U-Score but strong trend: momentum may be ahead of fundamentals.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue -22.6% · PAT -11.8% YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Rev -23% YoY · PAT -12% YoY · margin expansion · operating leverage
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹418 Cr | -22.6% | -31.6% |
| EBITDA | ₹151 Cr | -20.9% | -43.4% |
| Operating margin | 36.0% | +100 bps | -800 bps |
| PAT | ₹120 Cr | -11.8% | -36.8% |
| PAT margin | 28.7% | +352 bps | -239 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 21/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Trend is weak — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 33.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 51 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Healthcare valuation needs both earnings quality and regulatory/pipeline context.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Pharma — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Anthem Biosciences reported a significant revenue decline of 22.6% YoY and 31.5% QoQ in Q1FY27, driven by timing shifts in key customer deliveries. Despite revenue pressure, EBITDA and PAT margins improved YoY to 39.6% and 27.1% respectively, reflecting cost efficiencies and yield optimization.
The sharp revenue contraction in Q1FY27 raises concerns, though management attributes it to delivery timing. The YoY margin expansion is positive, indicating operational efficiency. The thesis hinges on the company's ability to execute scheduled deliveries in H2FY27 and demonstrate sustained underlying demand.
Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.
Management states 'The underlying demand remains strong'.
Management expects 'a higher concentration of scheduled deliveries in the latter half of the year'.
Management is 'firmly committed to sustaining revenue growth aligned with our long-term historical performance'.
Management states 'The underlying demand remains strong'.
Management expects 'a higher concentration of scheduled deliveries in the latter half of the year'.
Management highlights 'disciplined focus on cost efficiencies, yield optimisation, and employee productivity'.
Q1FY27 quarterly results reflect timing shifts in deliveries to key customers.
Q1FY27 quarterly results reflect timing shifts in deliveries to key customers, impacting current period revenue.
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
The company explicitly provides both YoY and QoQ comparisons. While QoQ shows a steeper decline, management's explanation of 'timing shifts in deliveries' suggests sequential momentum is impacted by short-term factors, making both comparisons relevant to understand performance against prior year and immediate prior quarter.
39.6% in Q1FY27, up 153 bps YoY from 38.1% in Q1FY26.
27.1% in Q1FY27, up 300 bps YoY from 24.1% in Q1FY26.
81.5% of total revenue in Q1FY27.
14 Commercial + 10 Late Stage (Phase III) Molecules.
Management is 'positioned to capture that momentum' from H2 deliveries.
Management is 'firmly committed to sustaining revenue growth aligned with our long-term historical performance'.
Management expects 'to sustain this performance through the year' on margins.
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -22.6% YoY in Q1FY27 | Execution of scheduled deliveries in H2FY27 to reverse revenue decline. |
| EBITDA Margin | 39.6% in Q1FY27 | Sustained margin profile through the year as guided by management. |
| Net Cash Position | ₹17,197 Mn as of June 30, 2026 | Deployment of cash for future growth or capacity expansion. |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 93rd percentile of the scored universe and 90th percentile within Pharma. Main check: results consistency is weak at 48/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Pharma: 90th pctile, median 70 · Large: 82nd pctile, median 73
28 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse