IP
IndiaPulse

Amber Enterprises India Limited (AMBER)

Small Cap

Consumer stocks · Small cap · NSE

Amber Enterprises India Limited, initially focused on Room Air Conditioners (RAC), has expanded into electronics and railways. The company has now entered the mobile phone manufacturing segment through a collaboration with Oppo Mobiles India Private Limited, aiming to diversify revenue and reduce seasonal concentration from its RAC business.

₹7,474
+64.00 · +0.86%
Quote04 Sept, 03:54 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 23.3 (n=433)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
23

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
61

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
50

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
47

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 5/100

PAT -97% YoY · Rev +13% YoY · margin expansion

Filed 14 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹3,887.7 Cr+12.7%-6.3%
EBITDA₹311.5 Cr+24.7%+7.0%
Operating margin8.0%+77 bps+99 bps
PAT₹3.1 Cr-97.1%-98.1%
PAT margin0.1%-299 bps-382 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-07-12T07:19:41.134Z
Management commentary snapshot

Amber Enterprises India Limited announces manufacturing collaboration with Oppo Mobiles India Private Limited for Oppo, OnePlus, and Realme brands.

The new mobile phone manufacturing collaboration with Oppo, OnePlus, and Realme diversifies Amber's revenue profile, reduces RAC seasonality, and aligns with its strategy of balancing high-margin value-added businesses with asset-light, high-volume, low-margin operations. Initial low margins are expected to improve with scale and deeper value addition.

Growth engines

Mobile Phone Manufacturing

Entry into India's mobile phone market, the second largest globally, with Oppo, OnePlus, and Realme brands.

Deepening Value Addition

Progressively deepen value addition into components such as high-density interconnect printed circuit boards.

Component Ecosystem

Long-term goal is to penetrate the mobile phone component business, where growth and margins are higher.

Capacity and execution

Mobile Phone Manufacturing Facility

Manufacturing at an existing Oppo facility under sublease. Capex requirements are minimal, below INR 50 crores to start.

Trial & Commercial Production

Trial production to commence in Q4 FY27, with commercial production starting by Q1 FY28.

Tailwinds

Government Policy Support

Government of India drives domestic value addition and import substitution with renewed intent and policy momentum (Atmanirbhar Bharat).

Global Brand Confidence

Oppo's decision reflects confidence in Amber's manufacturing capabilities, quality infrastructure, and ability to deliver at scale.

Headwinds

Domestic Market Volume Stagnation

Domestic mobile phone volumes have been almost stagnant over the last 4-5 years, though average selling prices are rising.

Low Initial Margins

Initial returns are in line with industry standards (1.5-2% EBITDA), which are relatively low for Amber's overall profile.

Risk radar

Execution Risk in New Segment

This is Amber's first endeavor into mobile phone manufacturing; management plans to take 'baby steps'.

Dependence on Oppo

Initial volumes and the value addition roadmap are tied to Oppo's plans and support, despite a long-term arrangement.

Competitive Landscape

Oppo already partners with other EMS players; Amber is not disturbing their existing ecosystem.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare QOQ

This call discusses a new business collaboration with future operational ramp-up targets. Financial results are not the primary focus; rather, sequential execution and capacity utilization are key for this new venture.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Volume Growth (Mobile Phones)

Expect to begin with ~8M units in year 1 (FY28), ramping up to 13M-15M units in year 2 (FY29).

EBITDA Margins (Mobile Phones)

Returns in line with industry standards at commencement (1.5-2% EBITDA), with improvement anticipated as operating scale and local value addition increase.

Local Value Addition

Commence with assembly and SMT, with a roadmap to progressively deepen value addition into components like HDI PCBs, aiming for 35-40% in 5-6 years.

Working Capital Intensity

Business is structurally low on working capital intensity, operating on net-working capital days of almost 4-10 days.

Management forward view

Strategic Diversification

Maintaining balance between high-margin value-added businesses and asset-light, high-volume, low-margin businesses.

Gradual Backward Integration

Objective is to gradually add components, similar to ACs, to increase margins over 5-6 years.

Dedicated Management

A senior management team will be dedicated to this sector, focusing on penetrating the component business.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Mobile Phone Production Volume8 million to 9 million units in year 1 (FY28).Ramp-up to 14 million to 15 million units in year 2 (FY29).
Local Value Addition ProgressCommence with assembly and SMT.Addition of HDI PCBs in year 2 and further component integration.
EBITDA Margin Improvement1.5% to 2% EBITDA at commencement.Margin improvement as operating scale and local value addition increases.
ROCE for Mobile BusinessMore than 30% to 35% on a standalone basis.Sustained high ROCE as the business scales and integrates components.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

50Neutral

SMA20 -2.4% / mo · MACD +

Stock trend: 54
Sector RS: 45
Sector 3M: -2.3% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

AMBERdaily · 1Y · AUTO-4.5%
Latest close ₹7474.00 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+0.6%
RSI
52
MACD hist
16.45
52W pos
58%
2026-09-04O ₹7428.00H ₹7524.00L ₹7380.00C ₹7474.00Vol 1.3L sh
₹5.98k₹6.76k₹7.55k₹8.33k₹9.12k52H7474.002026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 52.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 falling (~2.5% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 52 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 17% off 52W high · 38% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

43
RS percentile
Stage 3 Topping
1M return
+0.5%
3M return
-3.3%
6M return
+7.9%
1Y return
-9.9%
RS 1D
+4
RS 20D
+3
Sector rank
#12
Industry rank
#24
Stage evidence
  • 15.5% below the 52-week closing high after prior strength.
  • The 30-week proxy has stalled (+2.5% over 20 sessions).
  • Price has not yet confirmed a full Stage 4 downtrend.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price above
Sector
neutral
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 106+0.87%
7790102115128Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 26106
RS vs Nifty 500106

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 23 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

23U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth11/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet5/15
Cash Flow2/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
23

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

23/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Growth contributes 11/25 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 5/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -684.5%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
128.0
PB
6.0
EV/EBITDA
22.5
ROE
6.0%
ROCE
10.3%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.6
MoS
-684.5%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
23
Previous: 23
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-684.5%
Previous: -684.5%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
27
27
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹872.8
-756.3% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
35.0
Growth-justified Value
₹952.74
-684.5% MoS
PEG
8.77

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
61Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 32nd percentile of the scored universe and 34th percentile within Consumer. Main check: results consistency is weak at 47/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: 3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
164 docs text-extracted · 67 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
32nd percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 34th pctile, median 66 · Small: 36th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

164 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
55
watch · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
73
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
52
watch · capital discipline
Results
47
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 3/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • OPM spread across recent quarters is 3%.

Trust risks

  • 3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ROE is low at 6%.
  • 1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
128.00
P/B
6.02
EV/EBITDA
22.48
Market Cap
26359.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
5.99%
ROCE
10.30%
ROA
0.90%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
32.00%
EPS 5Y
19.00%
Revenue 3Y
21.00%
EPS 3Y
8.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.62
Interest Coverage
3.02×
Altman Z
3.38
Book Value
1242.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
2/5
OCF
240.00 Cr
EPS TTM
27.26

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
38.09%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
58%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Consumer, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.