Skip to content

Alpa Laboratories Limited (ALPA)

Small Cap

Pharma stocks · Small cap · NSE

Alpa Laboratories Limited operates in Formulations, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹52.25
-1.21 · -2.26%
Market cap ₹124 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result13 Aug, 08:29 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage12/14 · 86%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Pharma P/E 33.5 (n=187)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

52Neutral

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -6.5% / mo · RSI oversold · MACD − · near 52W low · sector +3.8pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 22
Sector RS: 98
Sector 3M: -1.8% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but the sector index is below its 100-session average. View sector evidence

Technical chart

ALPAD candles · FIT view-23.7%
Latest close ₹52.25 on 2026-10-19
Bar
+2.4%
RSI
26
MACD hist
-0.41
52W pos
13%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹51.01H ₹54.28L ₹51.01C ₹52.25Vol 5,277 sh
₹49.20₹56.97₹64.75₹72.53₹80.30₹52.252026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

ALPANifty PharmaNifty 500
-27%-15%-4%+7%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026ALPA -23.8%Nifty Pharma -1.5%Nifty 500 -5.6%
ALPA
-23.8%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Pharma
-1.5%
Vs Nifty 500
-18.2 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-44.3%
₹93.9
52W range position
13%
₹46.1 - ₹93.9
ATR (14)
5.6%
₹2.9
Volume vs 20D
0.23x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.1 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹50.6 - ₹62.4
30.5% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · WATCHLIST
32

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue +25.2% · PAT -91.7% YoY

Technical
Neutral
52

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+40.2%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
66

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -92% YoY · margin compression · Rev +25% YoY

Filed 13 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹23.9 Cr+25.2%-23.8%
EBITDA₹-4 Cr-1020.9%-210.0%
Operating margin-16.6%-1880 bps-2801 bps
PAT₹1 Cr-91.7%-29.0%
PAT margin4.1%-5749 bps-29 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
30.60
P/B
0.67
EV/EBITDA
127.00
Market Cap
124.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
8.38%
ROCE
9.40%
ROA
1.65%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
2.00%
EPS 5Y
24.00%
Revenue 3Y
4.00%
EPS 3Y
6.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.02
Interest Coverage
—
Altman Z
3.00
Book Value
88.50

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
6/5
OCF
9.00 Cr
EPS TTM
1.94

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
57.19%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
24%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 23.9-23.8% vs prev
039.9Sep 2023: 32.4Dec 2023: 27.3Mar 2024: 23.6Jun 2024: 21.4Sep 2024: 24.9Dec 2024: 26.1Mar 2025: 39.9Jun 2025: 19.1Sep 2025: 26.3Dec 2025: 29.1Mar 2026: 31.4Jun 2026: 23.9Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 1.0-29.0% vs prev
-2.1011.8Sep 2023: 5.8Dec 2023: 4.5Mar 2024: 3.5Jun 2024: 5.1Sep 2024: 7.7Dec 2024: 8.9Mar 2025: -2.1Jun 2025: 11.8Sep 2025: 0.1Dec 2025: 1.6Mar 2026: 1.4Jun 2026: 1.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 26.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~7.0% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 26 — oversold zone; bounce conditions.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 44% off 52W high · 13% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

11
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-12.0%
3M return
-23.8%
6M return
-23.8%
1Y return
-41.5%
RS 1D
-2
RS 20D
-11
Sector rank
#1
Industry rank
#11
Stage evidence
  • Price is 19.5% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -1.1%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
leading
Industry
leading
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 59.54-1.24%
55677890102Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2660
RS vs Nifty 50060

Valuation & peers

U-Score 32 · legacy U-Score band WATCHLIST · valuation evidence and comparable companies

32U-SCORE
WATCHLIST

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · WATCHLIST
Valuation16/30
Growth7/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet10/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
-8
Raw sum
32

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

32/100 · legacy band WATCHLIST

Positive drivers

  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 40.2%.
  • Balance sheet contributes 10/15 to the score.
  • Valuation contributes 16/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 7/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Healthcare valuation: PE/EVEBITDA with regulatory and pipeline checks

Healthcare valuation needs both earnings quality and regulatory/pipeline context.

Pharma PE/EVEBITDA
Primary lens
PE and EV/EBITDA adjusted for product mix and R&D/pipeline quality.
Secondary checks
USFDA risk, launch pipeline, margin trend, domestic vs export mix.
Main risk check
Regulatory setbacks or one-off product cycles can distort valuation.
PE
30.6
PB
0.7
EV/EBITDA
127.0
ROE
8.4%
ROCE
9.4%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+40.2%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
32
Previous: 32
Legacy U-Score band
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
+40.2%
Previous: +40.2%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +2 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
32

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹62.15
+15.9% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
45.0
Growth-justified Value
₹87.3
+40.2% MoS
PEG
1.82

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Pharma — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
BALAXI
Small
BALAXI PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED
Pharmaceuticals
match 166
9
51.7
0.6%
-5589%
OVERVALUED
JHS
Small
JHS Svendgaard Laboratories Limited
Pharmaceuticals
match 164
12
—
-1.2%
—
OVERVALUED
BALPHARMA
Small
Bal Pharma Limited
Pharmaceuticals
match 164
23
23.6
7.9%
-44%
OVERVALUED
BROOKS
Small
Brooks Laboratories Limited
Pharmaceuticals
match 163
60
12.1
22.0%
+68%
UNDERVALUED
CURIS
SME
Curis Lifesciences Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals
match 159
33
30.0
—
+57%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Alpa Laboratories Limited operates in Formulations, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
66Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 49th percentile of the scored universe and 36th percentile within Pharma. Main check: results consistency is weak at 29/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
3 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
49th percentile

overall median 67 · Pharma: 36th pctile, median 70 · Small: 54th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

3 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
88
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
50
watch · capital discipline
Results
29
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 57.2%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸6 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.02.

Trust risks

  • ▸3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸ROCE trend is -3.9%.
  • ▸1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 29.9%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

5 shown
AnnouncementSep 2026

Sep 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Change in Management 7 Sep - Radhika Biyani appointed Additional Independent Director from 5 Sept 2026; board committees reconstituted.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementJul 2026

Jul 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Cessation 22 Jul - Ms. Jyoti Jain ceased as Independent Director on 21 July 2026 after completing tenure.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Clarification 9 Apr - Alpa Laboratories clarifies no undisclosed price-sensitive event or near-term announcement exists.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.