Agarwal Float Glass India Ltd. (AGARWALFT)
SME CapIndustrials stocks · SME cap · NSE
Agarwal Float Glass India Ltd. operates in Float Glass, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Mixed fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Bad · 0/100Rev -27% YoY · margin compression
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹26.9 Cr | -26.9% | -29.7% |
| EBITDA | ₹0.9 Cr | -59.4% | -66.7% |
| Operating margin | 3.5% | -233 bps | -384 bps |
| PAT | ₹0 Cr | NDF | -98.6% |
| PAT margin | 0.1% | -256 bps | -372 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Issuer presentation review pending
Agarwal Float Glass India Ltd. operates in Float Glass, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Trend score and candlestick chart
36Bearishfull bear SMA stack · MACD − · near 52W low
Technical chart
AGARWALFTdaily · 1Y · AUTO-6.1%Daily technical trend read
NeutralTrend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 31.
- SMA20 roughly flat — short-term momentum stalled.
- RSI(14) at 31 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
- 58% off 52W high · 31% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 50 · FAIR VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 50 · FAIR VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Fundamental score breakdown
FAIR VALUEWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- FCF yield is supportive at 14.4%.
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 64.4%.
- Growth contributes 20/25 to the score.
Main drags
- Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
- Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Balance sheet is weaker at 6/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks
For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +5 points.
Factor attribution
Modelled fair value
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 42nd percentile of the scored universe and 40th percentile within Industrials. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 40/100.
Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 57.6%. Key concern: ROE is low at 7.6%.
Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.
overall median 67 · Industrials: 40th pctile, median 68 · SME: 51st pctile, median 64
0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Mixed Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 57.6%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸FCF yield is 14.4%.
Trust risks
- ▸ROE is low at 7.6%.
- ▸Revenue CAGR is 11% but EPS CAGR is -17%.
- ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 18.7%.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 14.10
- P/B
- 1.04
- EV/EBITDA
- 9.68
- Market Cap
- 20.70Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 7.64%
- ROCE
- 10.10%
- ROA
- 3.47%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 16.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 43.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 11.00%
- EPS 3Y
- -17.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.82
- Interest Coverage
- 2.54×
- Altman Z
- 2.97
- Book Value
- 27.60
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- 14.40%
- FCF Positive Y
- 3/5
- OCF
- 3.03 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 2.03
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 57.55%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 14%
Financial History
Updated 5/9/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable names in Industrials, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable names in Industrials, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable peers in Industrials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.