Investor presentationAug 2025
Aug 2025 · PPT
Source: Nse
Aesthetik Engineers Ltd. (AESTHETIK)
SME CapInfra stocks · SME cap · NSE
Aesthetik Engineers Ltd. operates in Engineering Services, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
₹71.8
+0.30 · +0.42%
Market cap ₹124 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 04:45 am ISTDetails
Quote21 Oct, 04:45 am IST
Base fundamentals16 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result24 May, 12:45 am IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Infra P/E 15.4 (n=87)
Technical timing lens
Trend score and candlestick chart
38BearishSMA20 -4.8% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector -2.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)
Stock trend: 40
Sector RS: 35
Sector 3M: -8.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Infra FPI tailwindFlow only
FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but the sector index is below its 100-session average. View sector evidence
Technical chart
AESTHETIKD candles · FIT view-6.8%Latest close ₹71.80 on 2026-10-15
Bar
-2.9%
RSI
60
MACD hist
0.65
52W pos
21%
2026-10-15O ₹73.95H ₹73.95L ₹71.55C ₹71.80Vol 7,000 sh
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context
Relative performance and chart statistics
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
AESTHETIKNifty InfraNifty 500
- AESTHETIK
- -4.3%
- Nifty 500
- -4.7%
- Nifty Infra
- -7.0%
- Vs Nifty 500
- +0.4 pp
Chart stats
15 Oct 2026- From 52W high
- -53.9%
- 52W range position
- 13%
- ATR (14)
- 1.9%
- Volume vs 20D
- 1.12x
- Avg traded value
- ₹0 Cr
- 20D price channel
- ₹64 - ₹74
₹155.6
₹59.6 - ₹155.6
₹1.4
Latest completed session
20-session average
29.9% annualized volatility
Research snapshot
What the evidence says now
Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.
Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · FAIR VALUE46
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Latest result
Bad2
Revenue +105.1% · PAT +0.0% YoY
Technical
Bearish38
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Valuation
Legacy model+24.9%
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Trust
Limited evidence71
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Financials
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Financials
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Latest result
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Bad · 2/100PAT 0% YoY · margin compression · Rev +105% YoY · +111% QoQ
Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹80 Cr | +105.1% | +110.5% |
| EBITDA | ₹6 Cr | NDF | +0.0% |
| Operating margin | 8.0% | NDF | -700 bps |
| PAT | ₹4 Cr | +0.0% | +0.0% |
| PAT margin | 5.0% | NDF | -553 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 17.30
- P/B
- 2.46
- EV/EBITDA
- 10.64
- Market Cap
- 124.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 15.10%
- ROCE
- 17.60%
- ROA
- 7.61%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 43.42%
- EPS 5Y
- 91.29%
- Revenue 3Y
- 43.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 85.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.50
- Interest Coverage
- 6.00×
- Altman Z
- 4.18
- Book Value
- 29.20
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- 1.61%
- FCF Positive Y
- 2/5
- OCF
- 15.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 4.14
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 69.57%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 21%
Financial History
Updated 20/10/2026
Revenue
₹ CrLatest: 80.0+110.5% vs prev
Net Profit
₹ CrLatest: 4.0+0.0% vs prev
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.
Technicals
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Technicals
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Daily technical trend read
Mixed signalsSignals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 60. Wait for confirmation.
- SMA20 falling (~5.0% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 60 — rising, no extreme reading.
- MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
- 40% off 52W high · 20% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Nifty 500 leadership
Relative Strength & Trend Stage
21
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
+2.6%
3M return
+0.2%
6M return
-12.4%
1Y return
-43.4%
RS 1D
+3
RS 20D
+12
Sector rank
#16
Industry rank
#70
Stage evidence
- Price is 4.0% below the 30-week proxy.
- The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -4.4%.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
212 observations
15 Oct 2026Value 54.5-0.24%
RS vs Nifty 50055
Valuation & peers
U-Score 46 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Valuation & peers
U-Score 46 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Financial Turnaround
Fundamental score breakdown
U band · FAIR VALUEValuation7/30
Growth22/25
Quality9/20
Balance Sheet8/15
Cash Flow3/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-8
Raw sum
46
Why this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
46/100 · legacy band FAIR VALUE
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 24.9%.
- Growth contributes 22/25 to the score.
Main drags
- Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
- Valuation is weaker at 7/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Cash flow is weaker at 3/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model
Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk
Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
17.3
PB
2.5
EV/EBITDA
10.6
ROE
15.1%
ROCE
17.6%
FCF Yield
1.6%
Debt/Equity
0.5
MoS
+24.9%
Score movement
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
46
Previous: 48 (-2)
Legacy U-Score band
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+24.9%
Previous: +25.2%
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: -1 points.
21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
50
50
50
50
50
50
49
49
49
49
49
48
Factor attribution
Valuation
7-2
was 9
Modelled fair value
Graham Number
₹52.15
-37.7% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
23.1
Growth-justified Value
₹95.63
+24.9% MoS
PEG
0.19
Comparable companies
Peers
Business-comparable peers in Infra — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
GIRIRAJ
SME
Giriraj Civil Developers Ltd.
Construction & Engineering
match 64
56
7.4
10.9%
+69%
FAIR VALUE
WINSOL
SME
Winsol Engineers Ltd.
Construction & Engineering
match 64
66
8.2
25.5%
+64%
UNDERVALUED
MRIL
SME
Mahendra Realtors & Infrastructure Ltd.
Construction & Engineering
match 64
76
7.1
18.3%
+69%
DEEP VALUE
INTEGRITY
SME
Integrity Infrabuild Developers Ltd.
Construction & Engineering
match 62
63
12.6
41.8%
+45%
UNDERVALUED
KONSTELEC
SME
Konstelec Engineers Ltd.
Construction & Engineering
match 62
45
10.0
7.1%
+57%
WATCHLIST
Business, management & trust
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Business, management & trust
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Business and thesis
Issuer presentation review pending
Aesthetik Engineers Ltd. operates in Engineering Services, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trust Score
71Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 66th percentile of the scored universe and 73rd percentile within Infra. Main check: results consistency is weak at 55/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
1 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
Relative rank
66th percentile
overall median 67 · Infra: 73rd pctile, median 64 · SME: 85th pctile, median 64
Evidence depth
Financial-only
1 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
Claim delivery
Outcome history still building
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Limited evidence · low confidenceWhat it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
65
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
89
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
58
watch · capital discipline
Results
55
watch · quarterly consistency
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 69.6%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸FCF yield is positive at 1.7%.
Trust risks
- ▸ROCE trend is -7.7%.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Continue researching Aesthetik Engineers Ltd.
Important announcements & filings
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2025
Mar 2025 · Annual Report 2025
Source: Nse
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.